Buscar recursos académicos

ABSTRACT This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objective is as follows: to consolidate the available evidence on attitudinal aspects related to the utilisation of digital technologies in health among...

Background Female Technology (FemTech) apps are increasingly used worldwide, but perspectives from Arabic-speaking users remain underreported. Understanding user priorities in this context is critical for culturally rele...

This study aims to identify the best predictive model for analysing online product reviews (OPRs) in the electronics industry, with a secondary focus on leveraging unstructured customer feedback to support product improv...

Understanding how consumers behave in e-commerce is essential for businesses, especially in today’s digital world where people rely heavily on online shopping platforms. A key part of this understanding comes from sent...

ABSTRACT: Objectives: To evaluate and synthesise the current evidence on the efficacy of laser-activated irrigation in endodontics, with a focus on microbial reduction, postoperative outcomes, and its potential as an ad...

Introduction and aims: There has been a substantial increase in the number of umbrella reviews (URs) published in dentistry. To ensure their conclusions are accurate, these URs must be assessed for methodological quality...

Abstract This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. This study has three main objectives: (1) To examine the time duration from title registration to publication of the protoc...

Abstract This is the protocol for a Campbell review. The review aims to systematically collect, appraise, map and synthesise the evidence from systematic reviews on the differential gender impacts of social protection pr...

ABSTRACT This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. The proposed overview of reviews aims to: (1) aggregate and systematize findings from multiple overviews of reviews, and offe...

Abstract This is the protocol for a Campbell evidence and gap map. The objective of the map is to map available systematic reviews on the effectiveness of treatments for depressive disorders among adults. Specifically, ...

Abstract It is difficult to match the causes of exclusion among two independent review authors after screening the title and abstract or full texts in systematic reviews. We have proposed the prioritization and sequentia...

ObjectiveTo track recent progress in the evaluation of orally administered glucosamine and/or chondroitin sulfate for osteoarthritis-related outcomes， and reanalyze the evaluation results.MethodsDatabase （CNKI， PUB...

The growth of the halal cosmetics market in Indonesia is driven by increasing awareness among Muslim consumers of halal aspects, product safety, and quality, as well as by digital information and perceived value in the p...

The article gives a detailed account of the requirements to material assurance engagements on reports by residents of Diia.City legal regime in conformity with International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000 (ISAE 3...

Abstract This is a protocol for a co‐registered Cochrane and Campbell Review (Methodology). The objectives are as follows: To identify, describe and assess methods for: when to replicate a systematic review; how to rep...

BACKGROUND: Synthesis of multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in a systematic review can summarize the effects of individual outcomes and provide numerical answers about the effectiveness of interventions. Filter...

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, ...

The number of published systematic reviews of studies of healthcare interventions has increased rapidly and these are used extensively for clinical and policy decisions. Systematic reviews are subject to a range of biase...

BACKGROUND: There is a growing recognition of the value of synthesising qualitative research in the evidence base in order to facilitate effective and appropriate health care. In response to this, methods for undertaking...

The PRISMA 2020 statement includes a checklist of 27 items to guide reporting of systematic reviews In this article we explain why reporting of each item is recommended, present bullet points that detail the reporting re...

Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, the...

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become increasinglyimportant in health care. Clinicians readthem to keep up to date with their field (1, 2), and they areoften used as a starting point for developing clinical pr...