Torna ai risultati
Scheda bibliografica · Consultazione e accesso
Artículo

Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?

Camila Soares Cunha et al · Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia

Accesso aperto disponibile
Lettura rapida. Controlla i dati essenziali della risorsa e accedi al contenuto con il pulsante principale. La scheda mostra solo le informazioni necessarie per identificare, citare e aprire l’opera.
Pubblicazione seriale

A survey of dairy calf management practices in some producing regions in Brazil

Questa pubblicazione seriale contiene 115 contenuti correlati.

Accesso alla risorsa

Apri il contenuto dall’opzione principale o scegli un’altra fonte disponibile.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Accesso principale

Accesso aperto disponibile

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Apri risorsa

Riepilogo

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

ABSTRACT This research was conducted to investigate the effect of live and inactive sugarcane yeast on beef cattle voluntary intake, apparent digestibility of nutrients, ruminal pH, volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentrations, and ruminal ammonia. Five rumen-cannulated Nellore heifers were distributed in a 5×5 Latin square design, with five experimental periods of 15 days, with seven days for adaptation to the additives and the remaining days for data records and sampling. Total mixed ration (TMR) was composed by corn silage (20%) and concentrate (80%) based on corn and soybean meal. Five treatments were evaluated: without additive use (negative control; NC); chemical buffer addition – 0.71% in concentrate DM of sodium bicarbonate and 0.18% of magnesium oxide (positive control, PC); 10 g/day live yeast (LY); 15 g/day of inactive yeast (IY15); and 30 g/day of inactive yeast (IY30). Sugarcane yeasts were directly infused in rumen immediately after morning and afternoon feed supply. Feed additives did not affect voluntary intake, nutrient digestibility, and sorting behavior of animals. However, heifers from all treatments presented preferential intake of fibrous fraction of diet, especially those from NC and IY15. Nitrogen balance, VFA concentrations, and blood parameters were not influenced as well. Sodium bicarbonate and magnesium oxide led to greater ruminal pH than yeast, and IY15 presented greater pH than IY30. Ruminal ammonia was increased by the use of additives. Active and inactive yeasts are not recommended as feed additives for bovines fed diets with 80% of concentrate since it allows animals to select fibrous particles from TMR, and no representative gain in ruminal parameters and digestibilities are guaranteed.

Come citare

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, C. S. C. E. (s. f.). Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?. https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820180259

MLA

al, Camila Soares Cunha et. "Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?.". https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820180259.

Chicago

al, Camila Soares Cunha et. s. f. "Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?.". https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820180259.

Harvard

al, C. S. C. E. s. f, Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?, Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, available at: https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820180259 [Accessed 8 Aug. 2026].

Condividi e stampa

Salva la scheda, copia il link permanente o stampala in PDF.

Esporta riferimento

Esporta il record nei formati più comuni per usarlo con un gestore bibliografico.

Dettagli della risorsa

Informazioni bibliografiche utili per verificare che sia il materiale corretto.

Titolo
Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?
Autore / collaboratori
Camila Soares Cunha et al
Editore
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
ISSN
1806-9290
ISSN
1806-9290
Lingua
Inglés

Soggetti

Esplora risorse correlate a partire da questi soggetti.

Copiato