← Volver a resultados
Ficha bibliográfica · Consulta y acceso
Artículo

Modified shehata surgery vs. laparoscopic One-stage orchiopexy for intra-abdominal cryptorchidism: a comparative retrospective study

Shiyu Xiong et al · Frontiers Media S.A · 2026

Acceso abierto disponible
Lectura rápida. Revisá los datos básicos del recurso y luego accedé al contenido desde el botón principal. En esta ficha solo se muestra la información necesaria para identificar la obra, citarla y abrirla.

Acceso al recurso

Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.

Acceso principal

Acceso abierto disponible

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Abrir recurso

Resumen

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

ObjectiveTo compare the therapeutic outcomes of a modified Shehata surgery with a condensed 4-week interstage interval vs. conventional laparoscopic one-stage orchiopexy for intra-abdominal cryptorchidism.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 70 children with unilateral intra-abdominal cryptorchidism (July 2020–June 2022), allocated to modified Shehata (Group A, n = 35) or one-stage orchiopexy (Group B, n = 35). The modified procedure involved laparoscopic traction/fixation followed by second-stage orchiopexy at 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were testicular volume and blood flow (Doppler) assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included serum testosterone (T), estradiol (E2), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) at 6 months, complication rates, success rate, and total treatment cost.ResultsBaseline characteristics were comparable. Group A demonstrated significantly larger testicular volume at all postoperative timepoints (P < 0.05) and superior blood flow at 6 months (97.1% vs. 77.1% ‘Rich’ flow, P = 0.032). Regarding secondary outcomes, Group A had more favorable 6-month hormonal profiles (higher T, lower FSH/E2, P < 0.05), a lower surgery-related complication rate (0% vs. 17.14%, P = 0.033), and a higher success rate (100% vs. 82.86%, P = 0.033), but incurred higher total cost (P < 0.001).ConclusionThe modified Shehata surgery with a 4-week interval yields superior testicular development, perfusion, endocrine function, and lower complications compared to one-stage orchiopexy, albeit at higher cost.

Cómo citar

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, S. X. E. (2026). Modified shehata surgery vs. laparoscopic One-stage orchiopexy for intra-abdominal cryptorchidism: a comparative retrospective study. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1764561

MLA

al, Shiyu Xiong et. "Modified shehata surgery vs. laparoscopic One-stage orchiopexy for intra-abdominal cryptorchidism: a comparative retrospective study." 2026. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1764561.

Chicago

al, Shiyu Xiong et. 2026. "Modified shehata surgery vs. laparoscopic One-stage orchiopexy for intra-abdominal cryptorchidism: a comparative retrospective study.". https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1764561.

Harvard

al, S. X. E. 2026, Modified shehata surgery vs. laparoscopic One-stage orchiopexy for intra-abdominal cryptorchidism: a comparative retrospective study, Frontiers Media S.A, available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1764561 [Accessed 29 Jun. 2026].

Compartir e imprimir

Guardá la ficha, copiá su enlace permanente o imprimila como PDF.

Exportar referencia

Si usás un gestor bibliográfico, podés exportar el registro en los formatos más comunes.

Detalles del recurso

Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.

Título
Modified shehata surgery vs. laparoscopic One-stage orchiopexy for intra-abdominal cryptorchidism: a comparative retrospective study
Autor / colaboradores
Shiyu Xiong et al
Editorial
Frontiers Media S.A
Año de publicación
2026
ISSN
2296-875X
ISSN
2296-875X
Idioma
eng

Materias

Explorá otros recursos relacionados a partir de estas materias.

Copiado