Torna ai risultati
Scheda bibliografica · Consultazione e accesso
Artículo

Modified shehata surgery vs. laparoscopic One-stage orchiopexy for intra-abdominal cryptorchidism: a comparative retrospective study

Shiyu Xiong et al · Frontiers Media S.A · 2026

Accesso aperto disponibile
Lettura rapida. Controlla i dati essenziali della risorsa e accedi al contenuto con il pulsante principale. La scheda mostra solo le informazioni necessarie per identificare, citare e aprire l’opera.

Accesso alla risorsa

Apri il contenuto dall’opzione principale o scegli un’altra fonte disponibile.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Accesso principale

Accesso aperto disponibile

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Apri risorsa

Riepilogo

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

ObjectiveTo compare the therapeutic outcomes of a modified Shehata surgery with a condensed 4-week interstage interval vs. conventional laparoscopic one-stage orchiopexy for intra-abdominal cryptorchidism.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 70 children with unilateral intra-abdominal cryptorchidism (July 2020–June 2022), allocated to modified Shehata (Group A, n = 35) or one-stage orchiopexy (Group B, n = 35). The modified procedure involved laparoscopic traction/fixation followed by second-stage orchiopexy at 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were testicular volume and blood flow (Doppler) assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included serum testosterone (T), estradiol (E2), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) at 6 months, complication rates, success rate, and total treatment cost.ResultsBaseline characteristics were comparable. Group A demonstrated significantly larger testicular volume at all postoperative timepoints (P < 0.05) and superior blood flow at 6 months (97.1% vs. 77.1% ‘Rich’ flow, P = 0.032). Regarding secondary outcomes, Group A had more favorable 6-month hormonal profiles (higher T, lower FSH/E2, P < 0.05), a lower surgery-related complication rate (0% vs. 17.14%, P = 0.033), and a higher success rate (100% vs. 82.86%, P = 0.033), but incurred higher total cost (P < 0.001).ConclusionThe modified Shehata surgery with a 4-week interval yields superior testicular development, perfusion, endocrine function, and lower complications compared to one-stage orchiopexy, albeit at higher cost.

Come citare

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, S. X. E. (2026). Modified shehata surgery vs. laparoscopic One-stage orchiopexy for intra-abdominal cryptorchidism: a comparative retrospective study. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1764561

MLA

al, Shiyu Xiong et. "Modified shehata surgery vs. laparoscopic One-stage orchiopexy for intra-abdominal cryptorchidism: a comparative retrospective study." 2026. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1764561.

Chicago

al, Shiyu Xiong et. 2026. "Modified shehata surgery vs. laparoscopic One-stage orchiopexy for intra-abdominal cryptorchidism: a comparative retrospective study.". https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1764561.

Harvard

al, S. X. E. 2026, Modified shehata surgery vs. laparoscopic One-stage orchiopexy for intra-abdominal cryptorchidism: a comparative retrospective study, Frontiers Media S.A, available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1764561 [Accessed 7 Aug. 2026].

Condividi e stampa

Salva la scheda, copia il link permanente o stampala in PDF.

Esporta riferimento

Esporta il record nei formati più comuni per usarlo con un gestore bibliografico.

Dettagli della risorsa

Informazioni bibliografiche utili per verificare che sia il materiale corretto.

Titolo
Modified shehata surgery vs. laparoscopic One-stage orchiopexy for intra-abdominal cryptorchidism: a comparative retrospective study
Autore / collaboratori
Shiyu Xiong et al
Editore
Frontiers Media S.A
Anno di pubblicazione
2026
ISSN
2296-875X
ISSN
2296-875X
Lingua
Inglés

Soggetti

Esplora risorse correlate a partire da questi soggetti.

Copiato