← Volver a resultados
Ficha bibliográfica · Consulta y acceso
Artículo de revista

Comparison of Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Agriculture Monitoring

Joseph Cerreta et al · Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University · 2019

Acceso abierto disponible
Lectura rápida. Revisá los datos básicos del recurso y luego accedé al contenido desde el botón principal. En esta ficha solo se muestra la información necesaria para identificar la obra, citarla y abrirla.
Publicación seriada

3D Printing Technology in Aerospace Industry – A Review

Esta publicación seriada contiene 428 contenidos relacionados.

Acceso al recurso

Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.

Acceso principal

Acceso abierto disponible

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Abrir recurso

Resumen

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

<p>Florida citrus growers need inexpensive methods to observe citrus plants to detect disease and stress consistently. Health vegetation indices, such as the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) collected from Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), can be used to identify variation in plant health. Simple-to-operate UAS may enable growers to determine within-field variation more frequently than with inspections from scouts, providing more frequent knowledge about the crop condition. This research compared two low-cost fixed-wing UAS, a $5,000 Parrot Disco Pro Ag and a $16,690 senseFly eBee, each equipped with a Parrot Sequoia multispectral camera, to determine if there were differences in the NDVI data results and ease of operation. There were no statistical differences between NDVI reflectance values obtained using the Disco Pro Ag (M = 0.62, SD = 0.15) and the eBee (M = 0.60, SD = 0.15), <em>t</em>(45) = -1.45; <em>p</em> = 0.15. There was a significant positive correlation between the datasets (Pearson correlation = 0.963, <em>p</em> = 0.00). These results suggest that both the Disco Pro Ag and eBee were equally capable of producing the same data from the Parrot Sequoia multispectral camera. Differences in mobility and methods of waypoint planning between these two low-cost UAS may provide remote pilots with different styles of operation. As growers continue to adopt UAS technology to understand their fields better, the characteristics of each system will be important for quick setup time and ease of use.</p>

Cómo citar

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, J. C. E. (2019). Comparison of Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Agriculture Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2019.1337

MLA

al, Joseph Cerreta et. "Comparison of Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Agriculture Monitoring." 2019. https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2019.1337.

Chicago

al, Joseph Cerreta et. 2019. "Comparison of Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Agriculture Monitoring.". https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2019.1337.

Harvard

al, J. C. E. 2019, Comparison of Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Agriculture Monitoring, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, available at: https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2019.1337 [Accessed 29 Jun. 2026].

Compartir e imprimir

Guardá la ficha, copiá su enlace permanente o imprimila como PDF.

Exportar referencia

Si usás un gestor bibliográfico, podés exportar el registro en los formatos más comunes.

Detalles del recurso

Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.

Título
Comparison of Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Agriculture Monitoring
Autor / colaboradores
Joseph Cerreta et al
Editorial
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
Año de publicación
2019
ISSN
2374-6793
ISSN
2374-6793
Idioma
eng

Materias

Explorá otros recursos relacionados a partir de estas materias.

Copiado