Torna ai risultati
Scheda bibliografica · Consultazione e accesso
Artículo de revista

Comparison of Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Agriculture Monitoring

Joseph Cerreta et al · Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University · 2019

Accesso aperto disponibile
Lettura rapida. Controlla i dati essenziali della risorsa e accedi al contenuto con il pulsante principale. La scheda mostra solo le informazioni necessarie per identificare, citare e aprire l’opera.
Pubblicazione seriale

3D Printing Technology in Aerospace Industry – A Review

Questa pubblicazione seriale contiene 428 contenuti correlati.

Accesso alla risorsa

Apri il contenuto dall’opzione principale o scegli un’altra fonte disponibile.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Accesso principale

Accesso aperto disponibile

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Apri risorsa

Riepilogo

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

<p>Florida citrus growers need inexpensive methods to observe citrus plants to detect disease and stress consistently. Health vegetation indices, such as the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) collected from Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), can be used to identify variation in plant health. Simple-to-operate UAS may enable growers to determine within-field variation more frequently than with inspections from scouts, providing more frequent knowledge about the crop condition. This research compared two low-cost fixed-wing UAS, a $5,000 Parrot Disco Pro Ag and a $16,690 senseFly eBee, each equipped with a Parrot Sequoia multispectral camera, to determine if there were differences in the NDVI data results and ease of operation. There were no statistical differences between NDVI reflectance values obtained using the Disco Pro Ag (M = 0.62, SD = 0.15) and the eBee (M = 0.60, SD = 0.15), <em>t</em>(45) = -1.45; <em>p</em> = 0.15. There was a significant positive correlation between the datasets (Pearson correlation = 0.963, <em>p</em> = 0.00). These results suggest that both the Disco Pro Ag and eBee were equally capable of producing the same data from the Parrot Sequoia multispectral camera. Differences in mobility and methods of waypoint planning between these two low-cost UAS may provide remote pilots with different styles of operation. As growers continue to adopt UAS technology to understand their fields better, the characteristics of each system will be important for quick setup time and ease of use.</p>

Come citare

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, J. C. E. (2019). Comparison of Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Agriculture Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2019.1337

MLA

al, Joseph Cerreta et. "Comparison of Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Agriculture Monitoring." 2019. https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2019.1337.

Chicago

al, Joseph Cerreta et. 2019. "Comparison of Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Agriculture Monitoring.". https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2019.1337.

Harvard

al, J. C. E. 2019, Comparison of Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Agriculture Monitoring, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, available at: https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2019.1337 [Accessed 7 Aug. 2026].

Condividi e stampa

Salva la scheda, copia il link permanente o stampala in PDF.

Esporta riferimento

Esporta il record nei formati più comuni per usarlo con un gestore bibliografico.

Dettagli della risorsa

Informazioni bibliografiche utili per verificare che sia il materiale corretto.

Titolo
Comparison of Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Agriculture Monitoring
Autore / collaboratori
Joseph Cerreta et al
Editore
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
Anno di pubblicazione
2019
ISSN
2374-6793
ISSN
2374-6793
Lingua
Inglés

Soggetti

Esplora risorse correlate a partire da questi soggetti.

Copiato