Comparative efficacy and safety of novel Lp(a)-lowering therapies for ASCVD prevention: A network meta-analysis

Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined and independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) that is largely resistant to conventional lipid-lowering therapies. Novel Lp(a)-targeted agents, including small interfering RNA (siRNA), antisense oligonucleotides (ASO), and the oral small-molecule inhibitor muvalaplin, have shown potent efficacy in early trials. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to comprehensively compare their efficacy and safety. A total of 25 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 7715 participants were included, evaluating six siRNA agents, four ASO agents, and one small-molecule inhibitor. The primary outcome was percentage change from baseline in Lp(a). Secondary outcomes included absolute change in Lp(a), percentage changes in apolipoprotein B (apoB) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and adverse events. SiRNA therapies achieved the greatest Lp(a) reductions (olpasiran: mean difference [MD] –92.1%, 95% CI –100.1 to –84.0%; zerlasiran: –80.6%, 95% CI –87.7 to –73.5%), followed by muvalaplin (–76.8%, 95% CI –90.3 to –63.2%) and ASO therapy (pelacarsen: –54.2%, 95% CI –72.2 to –36.2%; all P < 0.001). Most agents achieved absolute Lp(a) reductions exceeding 105 nmol/L, suggesting clinically meaningful benefit. Baseline Lp(a) levels significantly modified treatment response (P < 0.001), and concomitant proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor use further enhanced LDL-C reduction (P = 0.024). All therapies were well tolerated, with injection-site reactions most frequent for injectables, while muvalaplin was well tolerated. These findings indicate that targeted Lp(a)-lowering therapies substantially reduce circulating Lp(a), with siRNA showing the greatest potency and muvalaplin offering a convenient oral alternative for personalized ASCVD risk reduction.