Zurück zu den Ergebnissen
Bibliografischer Datensatz · Ansicht und Zugriff
Artículo

Prediction of infection in the emergency department—a machine learning model

Sara N. Søgaard et al · Frontiers Media S.A · 2026

Open Access verfügbar
Schnellübersicht. Prüfen Sie die grundlegenden Angaben und öffnen Sie den Inhalt über die Hauptschaltfläche. Die Seite zeigt nur die Informationen, die zum Identifizieren, Zitieren und Öffnen des Werks nötig sind.

Zugriff auf die Ressource

Öffnen Sie den Inhalt über die Hauptoption oder wählen Sie eine andere verfügbare Quelle.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Hauptzugriff

Open Access verfügbar

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Ressource öffnen

Übersicht

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

BackgroundThe integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into emergency medicine holds promise for enhancing early diagnosis and clinical decision-making. Traditional diagnostic approaches often rely on physician judgment or early warning scores that may delay identification of infections, especially when these tools prioritize outcomes such as mortality or ICU admission over early infection detection.ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify the most informative predictors of infection at emergency department (ED) admission using machine learning (ML), and to develop a predictive model for infection among acutely admitted patients with suspected infection.MethodsFour ML algorithms were evaluated: Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), and Random Forest (RF). Sequential forward selection was applied to LR and KNN to optimize predictor input. DT and RF incorporated intrinsic feature selection. Model performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value (PPV/NPV), accuracy, area under the ROC curve (AUC), average precision score (AP) with five-fold cross-validation.ResultsRF model outperformed the other ML models, achieving a specificity of 75%, a PPV of 94%, and an accuracy of 80% while DT showed marginally higher sensitivity but poorer specificity. LR and KNN demonstrated intermediate performance. The RF model had the highest mean AUC of 84% and AP of 96%.ConclusionRF model using readily available clinical variables—including C-reactive protein, leucocyte count, temperature, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate—can effectively predict infection at ED admission. This supports the potential of ML to enhance early infection detection and guide timely treatment in emergency settings.

Zitieren

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, S. N. S. E. (2026). Prediction of infection in the emergency department—a machine learning model. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.1812692

MLA

al, Sara N. Søgaard et. "Prediction of infection in the emergency department—a machine learning model." 2026. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.1812692.

Chicago

al, Sara N. Søgaard et. 2026. "Prediction of infection in the emergency department—a machine learning model.". https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.1812692.

Harvard

al, S. N. S. E. 2026, Prediction of infection in the emergency department—a machine learning model, Frontiers Media S.A, available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.1812692 [Accessed 8 Aug. 2026].

Teilen und drucken

Speichern Sie den Datensatz, kopieren Sie den Permalink oder drucken Sie ihn als PDF.

Referenz exportieren

Exportieren Sie den Datensatz in gängigen Formaten für Literaturverwaltungsprogramme.

Ressourcendetails

Bibliografische Angaben zur Prüfung, ob es sich um das richtige Material handelt.

Titel
Prediction of infection in the emergency department—a machine learning model
Autor / Mitwirkende
Sara N. Søgaard et al
Verlag
Frontiers Media S.A
Erscheinungsjahr
2026
ISSN
2624-8212
ISSN
2624-8212
Sprache
Inglés

Schlagwörter

Entdecken Sie über diese Schlagwörter weitere verwandte Ressourcen.

Kopiert