← Volver a resultados
Ficha bibliográfica · Consulta y acceso
Artículo

Assessment of newly designed fonts for visual accessibility.

Gordon E Legge et al · Public Library of Science (PLoS) · 2026

Acceso abierto disponible
Lectura rápida. Revisá los datos básicos del recurso y luego accedé al contenido desde el botón principal. En esta ficha solo se muestra la información necesaria para identificar la obra, citarla y abrirla.

Acceso al recurso

Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.

Acceso principal

Acceso abierto disponible

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Abrir recurso

Resumen

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

<h4>Purpose</h4>The visual accessibility of fonts refers to the range of print sizes and efficiency with which readers can access text. One goal of font design may be to maximize accessibility for a wide range of users including those with low vision. Here, we compare behavioral and automated methods for evaluating the accessibility of a font for both normal and simulated low vision.<h4>Method</h4>We evaluated the accessibility of a newly designed font, ACT Easy. In Experiment 1, we used a behavioral (psychophysical) approach to compare regular and bold versions of ACT Easy to Courier, Frutiger, and Gotham. 22 normally sighted young adults were tested with a computerized version of MNREAD in two conditions: normal viewing, and text digitally filtered to simulate moderate low vision (20/90 acuity). The outcome measures were reading acuity, critical print size, maximum reading speed, and participants' preference rankings. In Experiment 2, we used an automated method to estimate the equivalent of reading acuity for eleven state-of-the-art Optical Character Recognition models. The models read MNREAD sentences in ACT Easy and five mainstream fonts. We explored how accurately the models mimicked human performance.<h4>Results</h4>In Experiment 1, ACT Easy Regular compared well in reading acuity and critical print size with Courier, the best of the other fonts for both normal and simulated low-vision conditions. ACT Easy Regular and Gotham were favored in the preference rankings. In Experiment 2, nine of the eleven OCR models showed changes in reading acuity similar to humans in the normal and simulated low-vision conditions. Two of the models also exhibited human-like variations across fonts.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Behavioral and automated methods are both capable of revealing subtle differences in the visual accessibility of fonts. The behavioral method requires labor-intensive human testing. The automated method does not require human testing, and may sometimes provide a practical alternative.

Cómo citar

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, G. E. L. E. (2026). Assessment of newly designed fonts for visual accessibility. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345068

MLA

al, Gordon E Legge et. "Assessment of newly designed fonts for visual accessibility." 2026. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345068.

Chicago

al, Gordon E Legge et. 2026. "Assessment of newly designed fonts for visual accessibility.". https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345068.

Harvard

al, G. E. L. E. 2026, Assessment of newly designed fonts for visual accessibility, Public Library of Science (PLoS), available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345068 [Accessed 29 Jun. 2026].

Compartir e imprimir

Guardá la ficha, copiá su enlace permanente o imprimila como PDF.

Exportar referencia

Si usás un gestor bibliográfico, podés exportar el registro en los formatos más comunes.

Detalles del recurso

Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.

Título
Assessment of newly designed fonts for visual accessibility.
Autor / colaboradores
Gordon E Legge et al
Editorial
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Año de publicación
2026
ISSN
1932-6203
ISSN
1932-6203
Idioma
eng
Copiado