← Volver a resultados
Ficha bibliográfica · Consulta y acceso
Artículo

Randomised controlled trial comparing antibiotic cement bead pouch versus negative pressure wound therapy for the management of severe open tibia fracture wounds: Beads versus VAC (BvV) protocol

David Sanders et al · BMJ Publishing Group · 2026

Acceso institucional disponible
Lectura rápida. Revisá los datos básicos del recurso y luego accedé al contenido desde el botón principal. En esta ficha solo se muestra la información necesaria para identificar la obra, citarla y abrirla.

Acceso al recurso

Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.

Acceso principal

Acceso institucional disponible

El acceso puede requerir institución, suscripción, proxy, VPN o autenticación.
Abrir acceso

Resumen

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Introduction Early open fracture management aims to minimise the risk of complications. For the most severe open fracture wounds, multiple irrigation and debridement surgeries are required to overcome severe wound contamination, to reassess the evolving tissue injury or to temporise and plan further surgery. When multiple irrigation and debridement surgeries are needed, uncertainty remains about how the open fracture wound should be managed to best minimise complications. The primary aim of this trial is to compare the antibiotic cement bead pouch vs negative pressure wound therapy in the management of patients with severe open tibia fracture wounds.Methods and analysis BvV is a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel arm randomised controlled trial that aims to enrol 312 adult patients admitted to a participating centre with a severe open tibia fracture requiring multiple irrigation and debridement surgeries. Participants will be randomly allocated on a 1:1 basis to either antibiotic cement bead pouch or negative pressure wound therapy. The primary outcome will be a composite outcome to evaluate clinical status 6 months after randomisation. Using the win ratio approach, we will hierarchically assess the composite outcome in the following order: (i) all-cause mortality, (ii) injury-related amputation of the lower extremity, (iii) unplanned reoperation to manage wound complications, an infection or promote fracture healing and (iv) clinical fracture healing assessed using the Functional IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT) instrument.Ethics and dissemination The BvV trial has been approved by a central institutional review board (IRB) (Advarra) for clinical sites in the USA, the ethics board at the coordinating centre at McMaster University (Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board), and participating sites not using the central institutional IRB (Fraser Health Research Ethics Board, The University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board, Newfoundland and Labrador Health Research Ethics Board, University of Manitoba Biomedical Research Ethics Board). Additional clinical sites who are in the start-up phase, as well as any new selected clinical sites, will obtain local approvals prior to initiating trial activities. This will include a clinical site in the UK who is in the process of obtaining the necessary approvals. Recruitment began in November 2023. Both interventions are frequently used to manage severe open fracture wounds, ensuring that the trial results can be easily transitioned into clinical practice. The results of this trial will be disseminated to national and international partners through peer-reviewed publications, academic conferences and stakeholder engagement activities.Trial registration number NCT05615844.

Cómo citar

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, D. S. E. (2026). Randomised controlled trial comparing antibiotic cement bead pouch versus negative pressure wound therapy for the management of severe open tibia fracture wounds: Beads versus VAC (BvV) protocol. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088521

MLA

al, David Sanders et. "Randomised controlled trial comparing antibiotic cement bead pouch versus negative pressure wound therapy for the management of severe open tibia fracture wounds: Beads versus VAC (BvV) protocol." 2026. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088521.

Chicago

al, David Sanders et. 2026. "Randomised controlled trial comparing antibiotic cement bead pouch versus negative pressure wound therapy for the management of severe open tibia fracture wounds: Beads versus VAC (BvV) protocol.". https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088521.

Harvard

al, D. S. E. 2026, Randomised controlled trial comparing antibiotic cement bead pouch versus negative pressure wound therapy for the management of severe open tibia fracture wounds: Beads versus VAC (BvV) protocol, BMJ Publishing Group, available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088521 [Accessed 29 Jun. 2026].

Compartir e imprimir

Guardá la ficha, copiá su enlace permanente o imprimila como PDF.

Exportar referencia

Si usás un gestor bibliográfico, podés exportar el registro en los formatos más comunes.

Detalles del recurso

Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.

Título
Randomised controlled trial comparing antibiotic cement bead pouch versus negative pressure wound therapy for the management of severe open tibia fracture wounds: Beads versus VAC (BvV) protocol
Autor / colaboradores
David Sanders et al
Editorial
BMJ Publishing Group
Año de publicación
2026
ISSN
2044-6055
ISSN
2044-6055
Idioma
eng
Copiado