Comparative Outcomes and Indications of Phakic Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) Exchange or Explantation in Keratoconus versus Non-Ectatic Eyes at a Tertiary Eye Hospital in Iraq
Imad Hussein Sachit et al · Ukrainian Society of Ophthalmologists · 2026
A case series study on exploring the role of HLA B27 among patients with retinitis pigmentosa and uveitis and short-term treatment response
Acceso al recurso
Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.
Material complementario disponible
Resumen
Descripción general del contenido del recurso.
Methods: This retrospective record review included ICL (V4b) procedures performed between January 2022 and January 2024. Among 200 implanted eyes, 25 eyes (12.5%) underwent secondary surgery and were included for group comparison: keratoconus group (n=10) and non-ectatic group (n=15). Clinical data included visual acuity, refraction, intraocular pressure, endothelial cell density, corneal parameters, and vault. Comparative analyses were performed between groups, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results: In the keratoconus group, ICL exchange occurred in 5/10 (50.0%) and explantation in 5/10 (50.0%); in the non-ectatic group, exchange occurred in 8/15 (53.3%) and explantation in 7/15 (46.7%). The primary indications for exchange/explantation differed between groups. In keratoconus eyes, indications were vault-related issues (7/10; 70.0%), residual refractive concerns (2/10; 20.0%), and patient dissatisfaction (1/10; 10.0%). In non-ectatic eyes, indications were vault-related issues (9/15; 60.0%), cataract (2/15; 13.3%), elevated intraocular pressure (2/15; 13.3%), refractive concerns (1/15; 6.7%), and patient dissatisfaction (1/15; 6.7%).
Conclusion: ICL exchange or explantation occurred in 12.5% of implanted eyes in this cohort. Vault-related indications were the most common reason for secondary intervention in both groups, while cataract and elevated intraocular pressure were observed only in the non-ectatic group. These findings support careful sizing/vault assessment and structured follow-up in eyes undergoing ICL implantation.
Cómo citar
Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.
APA 7
al, I. H. S. E. (2026). Comparative Outcomes and Indications of Phakic Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) Exchange or Explantation in Keratoconus versus Non-Ectatic Eyes at a Tertiary Eye Hospital in Iraq. https://doi.org/10.31288/Ukr.j.ophthalmol.202611420
MLA
al, Imad Hussein Sachit et. "Comparative Outcomes and Indications of Phakic Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) Exchange or Explantation in Keratoconus versus Non-Ectatic Eyes at a Tertiary Eye Hospital in Iraq." 2026. https://doi.org/10.31288/Ukr.j.ophthalmol.202611420.
Chicago
al, Imad Hussein Sachit et. 2026. "Comparative Outcomes and Indications of Phakic Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) Exchange or Explantation in Keratoconus versus Non-Ectatic Eyes at a Tertiary Eye Hospital in Iraq.". https://doi.org/10.31288/Ukr.j.ophthalmol.202611420.
Harvard
al, I. H. S. E. 2026, Comparative Outcomes and Indications of Phakic Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) Exchange or Explantation in Keratoconus versus Non-Ectatic Eyes at a Tertiary Eye Hospital in Iraq, Ukrainian Society of Ophthalmologists, available at: https://doi.org/10.31288/Ukr.j.ophthalmol.202611420 [Accessed 28 Jun. 2026].
Detalles del recurso
Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.
- Título
- Comparative Outcomes and Indications of Phakic Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) Exchange or Explantation in Keratoconus versus Non-Ectatic Eyes at a Tertiary Eye Hospital in Iraq
- Autor / colaboradores
- Imad Hussein Sachit et al
- Editorial
- Ukrainian Society of Ophthalmologists
- Año de publicación
- 2026
- ISSN
- 3083-7197
- ISSN
- 3083-7197
- Idioma
- eng
Materias
Explorá otros recursos relacionados a partir de estas materias.