← Volver a resultados
Ficha bibliográfica · Consulta y acceso
Artículo de revista

A New Analysis of An Old Box of Bones: Debunking a Peking Man Deception

Elizabeth M. DeVisser et al · Paleoanthropology Society · 2021

Material complementario disponible
Lectura rápida. Revisá los datos básicos del recurso y luego accedé al contenido desde el botón principal. En esta ficha solo se muestra la información necesaria para identificar la obra, citarla y abrirla.
Publicación seriada

11th Annual Meeting of the European Society for the Study of Human Evolution Abstracts Online, 22-24 September 2021

Esta publicación seriada contiene 440 contenidos relacionados.

Acceso al recurso

Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.

Acceso principal

Material complementario disponible

El enlace apunta a material asociado, anexos, tablas, datos o página complementaria. No se marca como libro/texto completo.
Abrir material

Resumen

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Anthropologists have searched fruitlessly for the Peking Man fossils for almost eighty years. Writers have made many unwarranted claims about the loss of the fossils, starting with the assumption that they were transferred from Chinese to American control just before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941 and then brought to the United States. This line of thinking is primarily supported by a highly suspect piece of evidence that came to public attention in 1972—a photograph of a Marine footlocker with many bones, one of which appeared to be a Peking Man skull. Although experts examined the photograph, no formal analysis was performed. Nonetheless, people who have written about this subject have assumed the box of bones contains at least one of the Peking Man fossils and thus that the collection reached the U.S. After conducting a detailed inventory and analysis of the contents of the footlocker as revealed in the photograph, we propose that the photograph is a deception; all bones except the skull are modern anatomical specimens while the skull is best interpreted as a teaching cast. Thus, the photograph cannot be used as evidence that the Peking Man fossils ever came to the U.S.

Cómo citar

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, E. M. D. E. (2021). A New Analysis of An Old Box of Bones: Debunking a Peking Man Deception. https://doi.org/10.48738/2021.iss1.71

MLA

al, Elizabeth M. DeVisser et. "A New Analysis of An Old Box of Bones: Debunking a Peking Man Deception." 2021. https://doi.org/10.48738/2021.iss1.71.

Chicago

al, Elizabeth M. DeVisser et. 2021. "A New Analysis of An Old Box of Bones: Debunking a Peking Man Deception.". https://doi.org/10.48738/2021.iss1.71.

Harvard

al, E. M. D. E. 2021, A New Analysis of An Old Box of Bones: Debunking a Peking Man Deception, Paleoanthropology Society, available at: https://doi.org/10.48738/2021.iss1.71 [Accessed 29 Jun. 2026].

Compartir e imprimir

Guardá la ficha, copiá su enlace permanente o imprimila como PDF.

Exportar referencia

Si usás un gestor bibliográfico, podés exportar el registro en los formatos más comunes.

Detalles del recurso

Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.

Título
A New Analysis of An Old Box of Bones: Debunking a Peking Man Deception
Autor / colaboradores
Elizabeth M. DeVisser et al
Editorial
Paleoanthropology Society
Año de publicación
2021
ISSN
1545-0031
ISSN
1545-0031
Idioma
eng
Copiado