← Volver a resultados
Ficha bibliográfica · Consulta y acceso
Artículo

Comparing YOLO and U-net deep learning algorithms in chronic wound image segmentation

Indrani Marchal et al · BMC · 2026

Material complementario disponible
Lectura rápida. Revisá los datos básicos del recurso y luego accedé al contenido desde el botón principal. En esta ficha solo se muestra la información necesaria para identificar la obra, citarla y abrirla.

Acceso al recurso

Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.

Acceso principal

Material complementario disponible

El enlace apunta a material asociado, anexos, tablas, datos o página complementaria. No se marca como libro/texto completo.
Abrir material

Resumen

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Abstract Chronic wound analysis is crucial for effective wound care, necessitating precise and efficient segmentation techniques. This study explores the use of YOLOv8 and YOLO11, renowned deep learning algorithms for object detection, in medical image segmentation. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted comparing different versions of YOLOv8 and YOLO11 with the benchmark U-Net model using the FUSeg and Wound Data databases. Both databases were used simultaneously for training and testing to achieve a cross-dataset validation, ensuring the robustness of our models, and highlighting the importance of having data from different sources to represent the problem in various clinical contexts, thereby allowing AI models to be more adaptable and generalizable. Results show that both YOLO models significantly outperform U-Net in terms of segmentation accuracy, generalization, and inference speed. YOLOv8n achieved the highest performance with an IoU of 71.7%, a precision of 83.8%, a recall of 77.9%, and a DSC of 79.3%, and, while YOLO11s, the best performing of the YOLO11 models (IoU of 70.1%, Precision of 81.9%, Recall of 79.9%, and DSC of 78.5%), distinguished itself for its stability between thresholds and robustness across datasets. This research confirms that modern YOLO architectures offer fast, accurate, and robust solutions for automated wound segmentation, laying the groundwork for further development in AI-driven wound analysis and diagnosis.

Cómo citar

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, I. M. E. (2026). Comparing YOLO and U-net deep learning algorithms in chronic wound image segmentation. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02266-7

MLA

al, Indrani Marchal et. "Comparing YOLO and U-net deep learning algorithms in chronic wound image segmentation." 2026. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02266-7.

Chicago

al, Indrani Marchal et. 2026. "Comparing YOLO and U-net deep learning algorithms in chronic wound image segmentation.". https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02266-7.

Harvard

al, I. M. E. 2026, Comparing YOLO and U-net deep learning algorithms in chronic wound image segmentation, BMC, available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02266-7 [Accessed 29 Jun. 2026].

Compartir e imprimir

Guardá la ficha, copiá su enlace permanente o imprimila como PDF.

Exportar referencia

Si usás un gestor bibliográfico, podés exportar el registro en los formatos más comunes.

Detalles del recurso

Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.

Título
Comparing YOLO and U-net deep learning algorithms in chronic wound image segmentation
Autor / colaboradores
Indrani Marchal et al
Editorial
BMC
Año de publicación
2026
ISSN
1471-2342
ISSN
1471-2342
Idioma
eng

Materias

Explorá otros recursos relacionados a partir de estas materias.

Copiado