Torna ai risultati
Scheda bibliografica · Consultazione e accesso
Artículo

Comparing YOLO and U-net deep learning algorithms in chronic wound image segmentation

Indrani Marchal et al · BMC · 2026

Materiale supplementare disponibile
Lettura rapida. Controlla i dati essenziali della risorsa e accedi al contenuto con il pulsante principale. La scheda mostra solo le informazioni necessarie per identificare, citare e aprire l’opera.

Accesso alla risorsa

Apri il contenuto dall’opzione principale o scegli un’altra fonte disponibile.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Accesso principale

Materiale supplementare disponibile

El enlace apunta a material asociado, anexos, tablas, datos o página complementaria. No se marca como libro/texto completo.
Apri materiale

Riepilogo

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Abstract Chronic wound analysis is crucial for effective wound care, necessitating precise and efficient segmentation techniques. This study explores the use of YOLOv8 and YOLO11, renowned deep learning algorithms for object detection, in medical image segmentation. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted comparing different versions of YOLOv8 and YOLO11 with the benchmark U-Net model using the FUSeg and Wound Data databases. Both databases were used simultaneously for training and testing to achieve a cross-dataset validation, ensuring the robustness of our models, and highlighting the importance of having data from different sources to represent the problem in various clinical contexts, thereby allowing AI models to be more adaptable and generalizable. Results show that both YOLO models significantly outperform U-Net in terms of segmentation accuracy, generalization, and inference speed. YOLOv8n achieved the highest performance with an IoU of 71.7%, a precision of 83.8%, a recall of 77.9%, and a DSC of 79.3%, and, while YOLO11s, the best performing of the YOLO11 models (IoU of 70.1%, Precision of 81.9%, Recall of 79.9%, and DSC of 78.5%), distinguished itself for its stability between thresholds and robustness across datasets. This research confirms that modern YOLO architectures offer fast, accurate, and robust solutions for automated wound segmentation, laying the groundwork for further development in AI-driven wound analysis and diagnosis.

Come citare

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, I. M. E. (2026). Comparing YOLO and U-net deep learning algorithms in chronic wound image segmentation. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02266-7

MLA

al, Indrani Marchal et. "Comparing YOLO and U-net deep learning algorithms in chronic wound image segmentation." 2026. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02266-7.

Chicago

al, Indrani Marchal et. 2026. "Comparing YOLO and U-net deep learning algorithms in chronic wound image segmentation.". https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02266-7.

Harvard

al, I. M. E. 2026, Comparing YOLO and U-net deep learning algorithms in chronic wound image segmentation, BMC, available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02266-7 [Accessed 8 Aug. 2026].

Condividi e stampa

Salva la scheda, copia il link permanente o stampala in PDF.

Esporta riferimento

Esporta il record nei formati più comuni per usarlo con un gestore bibliografico.

Dettagli della risorsa

Informazioni bibliografiche utili per verificare che sia il materiale corretto.

Titolo
Comparing YOLO and U-net deep learning algorithms in chronic wound image segmentation
Autore / collaboratori
Indrani Marchal et al
Editore
BMC
Anno di pubblicazione
2026
ISSN
1471-2342
ISSN
1471-2342
Lingua
Inglés

Soggetti

Esplora risorse correlate a partire da questi soggetti.

Copiato