← Volver a resultados
Ficha bibliográfica · Consulta y acceso
Artículo

Efficacy and safety of Clevidipine for blood pressure control after carotid endarterectomy: a prospective cohort study

Vives M et al · BMC · 2026

Acceso abierto disponible
Lectura rápida. Revisá los datos básicos del recurso y luego accedé al contenido desde el botón principal. En esta ficha solo se muestra la información necesaria para identificar la obra, citarla y abrirla.

Acceso al recurso

Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.

Acceso principal

Acceso abierto disponible

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Abrir recurso

Resumen

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Abstract Background Strict postoperative blood pressure (BP) control within a narrow range is crucial after Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) to minimize risks like stroke and hyperperfusion syndrome. Our institution targets a systolic BP (sBP) of 130–145 mmHg post-CEA. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of clevidipine versus standard intravenous antihypertensive treatment (labetalol ± urapidil) in maintaining this target range. Materials and Methods This single-center, prospective cohort study included consecutive patients (> 18 years) undergoing CEA at Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr J Trueta, Girona, Spain, between August 2018 and October 2021. Patients received either clevidipine or non-clevidipine treatment (labetalol ± urapidil) based on physician preference. The primary outcome was the Area Under the Curve for sBP outside the target range (AUC-sBP), normalized per hour (mmHg x min/h), during the first six postoperative hours. Data were analyzed using non-parametric tests and adjusted linear regression. Results Data from 97 patients (44 clevidipine, 53 non-clevidipine [38 labetalol only, 15 labetalol + urapidil]) were analyzed. The clevidipine group had higher baseline sBP (144 ± 15 vs 140 ± 7 mmHg, SMD -0.34) and more comorbidities. Clevidipine use was associated with a significantly lower AUC-sBP compared to the non-clevidipine group (median [IQR]: 120 [92–150] vs 240 [240–300] mmHg x min/h, p < 0.00001). This association remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, and preoperative sBP (coef. -220 mmHg x min/h [95% CI -293 to -146], p = 0.0001). Mean cumulative clevidipine dose was 58 ± 86 mg over 14 ± 10 h. No significant differences were observed in secondary outcomes or pre-specified adverse events between groups. Conclusion In this cohort, clevidipine treatment was associated with significantly better adherence to the target sBP range during the first six hours post-CEA compared to standard therapy with labetalol ± urapidil, without an observed increase in adverse effects.

Cómo citar

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, V. M. E. (2026). Efficacy and safety of Clevidipine for blood pressure control after carotid endarterectomy: a prospective cohort study. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-026-00377-9

MLA

al, Vives M et. "Efficacy and safety of Clevidipine for blood pressure control after carotid endarterectomy: a prospective cohort study." 2026. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-026-00377-9.

Chicago

al, Vives M et. 2026. "Efficacy and safety of Clevidipine for blood pressure control after carotid endarterectomy: a prospective cohort study.". https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-026-00377-9.

Harvard

al, V. M. E. 2026, Efficacy and safety of Clevidipine for blood pressure control after carotid endarterectomy: a prospective cohort study, BMC, available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-026-00377-9 [Accessed 29 Jun. 2026].

Compartir e imprimir

Guardá la ficha, copiá su enlace permanente o imprimila como PDF.

Exportar referencia

Si usás un gestor bibliográfico, podés exportar el registro en los formatos más comunes.

Detalles del recurso

Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.

Título
Efficacy and safety of Clevidipine for blood pressure control after carotid endarterectomy: a prospective cohort study
Autor / colaboradores
Vives M et al
Editorial
BMC
Año de publicación
2026
ISSN
2731-3786
ISSN
2731-3786
Idioma
eng

Materias

Explorá otros recursos relacionados a partir de estas materias.

Copiado