← Volver a resultados
Ficha bibliográfica · Consulta y acceso
Artículo

Prospective primary teachers’ views on the nature of science

Amador Rodriguez, Rafael Yecid et al · OmniaScience · 2021

Acceso abierto al texto completo
Lectura rápida. Revisá los datos básicos del recurso y luego accedé al contenido desde el botón principal. En esta ficha solo se muestra la información necesaria para identificar la obra, citarla y abrirla.

Acceso al recurso

Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.

Acceso principal

Acceso abierto al texto completo

Texto completo identificado como acceso abierto.
Abrir texto

Resumen

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

This article presents the results of a piece of research that analyzed the views on the nature of science (NOS) among student teachers enrolled in programs of Primary Education at two public universities in Spain. Previous studies have reported that science teachers maintain ‘eclectic’ epistemological perspectives on science; in this article, we test if such a hypothesis holds when teachers’ NOS ideas are ‘anchored’ in specific periods and topics of the philosophy of science. We studied 114 prospective teachers attending an undergraduate teaching course with emphasis on the natural sciences at the Universities of Burgos and Valladolid in the period of 2017-18. A Likert-scale questionnaire with 37 items was applied to determine trends in those teachers’ epistemological views on science. The results showed that teachers’ views are mostly correlated with the philosophical period of Logical Positivism/Received View, and to some extent to the period of Recent and Contemporary Accounts. Regarding the classical epistemological topics of correspondence, methodologies, intervention, evolution and representation, teachers’ views could be related to the period of Logical Positivism/Received View and Critical Rationalism, but also to the New Philosophy of Science. The main conclusion of this study is that teachers’ expressed views on NOS are epistemologically eclectic to a much smaller degree when examined with more details concerning specific periods and topics of the philosophy of science.
Fil: Amador Rodriguez, Rafael Yecid. Universidad del Norte; Colombia
Fil: Aduriz Bravo, Agustin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Centro de Formación e Investigación en Enseñanza de las Ciencias; Argentina

Cómo citar

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

Amador Rodriguez, R. Y. E. A. (2021). Prospective primary teachers’ views on the nature of science. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/162623

MLA

Amador Rodriguez, Rafael Yecid et al. "Prospective primary teachers’ views on the nature of science." 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/162623.

Chicago

Amador Rodriguez, Rafael Yecid et al. 2021. "Prospective primary teachers’ views on the nature of science.". http://hdl.handle.net/11336/162623.

Harvard

Amador Rodriguez, R. Y. E. A. 2021, Prospective primary teachers’ views on the nature of science, OmniaScience, available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/162623 [Accessed 24 Jun. 2026].

Compartir e imprimir

Guardá la ficha, copiá su enlace permanente o imprimila como PDF.

Exportar referencia

Si usás un gestor bibliográfico, podés exportar el registro en los formatos más comunes.

Detalles del recurso

Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.

Título
Prospective primary teachers’ views on the nature of science
Autor / colaboradores
Amador Rodriguez, Rafael Yecid et al
Editorial
OmniaScience
Año de publicación
2021
ISSN
2014-5349
ISSN
2014-5349
Idioma
eng

Materias

Explorá otros recursos relacionados a partir de estas materias.

Copiado