← Volver a resultados
Ficha bibliográfica · Consulta y acceso
Artículo

Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) versus conventional stone-pushing technique for impacted upper ureteral stones: a retrospective cohort study

Jianpeng Han et al · BMC · 2026

Acceso abierto disponible
Lectura rápida. Revisá los datos básicos del recurso y luego accedé al contenido desde el botón principal. En esta ficha solo se muestra la información necesaria para identificar la obra, citarla y abrirla.

Acceso al recurso

Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.

Acceso principal

Acceso abierto disponible

DOAJ DOAJ - Open Access Journals
Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Abrir recurso

Resumen

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Abstract Background Impacted upper ureteral stones pose a significant risk of ureteral injury and stricture formation during ureteroscopic procedures. The Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) integrates in-situ lithotripsy, continuous suction, and irrigation. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of FANS with the conventional ureteroscopic technique in the management of impacted upper ureteral stones. Methods A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 115 patients (FANS group: n = 50; Conventional group: n = 65). The FANS group underwent in-situ holmium laser lithotripsy with real-time irrigation and suction facilitated by FANS. The Conventional group underwent in-situ lithotripsy using a semi-rigid ureteroscope, with subsequent attempts to push stones into the renal pelvis before flexible ureteroscopic fragment extraction. The rates of ureteral stricture (within 3 months) and other perioperative parameters, including operative time, in-situ lithotripsy duration, and complications, were compared. Results Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The FANS group exhibited significantly longer operative and in-situ lithotripsy times. However, the incidence of ureteral stricture and perforation was lower in the FANS group (2% vs. 7.7% and 2% vs. 6.2%, respectively). Subgroup analyses revealed that prolonged in-situ lithotripsy time was a significant risk factor for ureteral stricture in the control group but not in the FANS group. The immediate stone-free rate was comparable between groups, with a lower rate of postoperative fever in the FANS group. Conclusion For impacted upper ureteral stones, FANS assisted in-situ lithotripsy significantly reduces the risk of postoperative ureteral stricture without compromising stone clearance, offering a safer alternative to the conventional stone-pushing technique.

Cómo citar

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, J. H. E. (2026). Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) versus conventional stone-pushing technique for impacted upper ureteral stones: a retrospective cohort study. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-026-02120-6

MLA

al, Jianpeng Han et. "Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) versus conventional stone-pushing technique for impacted upper ureteral stones: a retrospective cohort study." 2026. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-026-02120-6.

Chicago

al, Jianpeng Han et. 2026. "Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) versus conventional stone-pushing technique for impacted upper ureteral stones: a retrospective cohort study.". https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-026-02120-6.

Harvard

al, J. H. E. 2026, Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) versus conventional stone-pushing technique for impacted upper ureteral stones: a retrospective cohort study, BMC, available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-026-02120-6 [Accessed 23 Jun. 2026].

Compartir e imprimir

Guardá la ficha, copiá su enlace permanente o imprimila como PDF.

Exportar referencia

Si usás un gestor bibliográfico, podés exportar el registro en los formatos más comunes.

Detalles del recurso

Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.

Título
Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) versus conventional stone-pushing technique for impacted upper ureteral stones: a retrospective cohort study
Autor / colaboradores
Jianpeng Han et al
Editorial
BMC
Año de publicación
2026
ISSN
1471-2490
ISSN
1471-2490
Idioma
eng

Materias

Explorá otros recursos relacionados a partir de estas materias.

Copiado