← Volver a resultados
Ficha bibliográfica · Consulta y acceso
Artículo

Treatment for Dientamoeba fragilis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Nadav Baharav et al · Adis, Springer Healthcare · 2026

Acceso abierto disponible
Lectura rápida. Revisá los datos básicos del recurso y luego accedé al contenido desde el botón principal. En esta ficha solo se muestra la información necesaria para identificar la obra, citarla y abrirla.

Acceso al recurso

Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.

Acceso principal

Acceso abierto disponible

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Abrir recurso

Resumen

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Abstract Introduction Dientamoeba fragilis (D. fragilis) is detected in stool tests of patients with gastrointestinal symptoms. Despite a debate over its pathogenicity, treatment is often prescribed, after excluding other reasons. The most commonly used therapy in practice is metronidazole; however, evidence to support this practice is limited. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis compiling studies evaluating metronidazole vs any other regimen for the treatment of D. fragilis. Studies reporting treatment outcomes (clinical and/or microbiological) of D. fragilis regimens diagnosed by standard stool microscopy and polymerase chain reaction. We searched PubMed, Cochrane library, and Web of Science up to March 2025 for relevant studies. The primary outcome was clinical response; microbiological response was a secondary outcome. Results We included 12 comparative studies in the quantitative meta-analysis and additional non-comparative studies in the qualitative systematic review. Two studies were randomized controlled trials (RCT), and others were observational studies. Nine studies were included in the analysis of the primary outcome. Significantly higher clinical response rates were demonstrated with paromomycin (odds ratio [OR] 2.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37–3.89, without heterogeneity) and clioquinol (odds ratio [OR] 2.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26–5.05, without heterogeneity) compared to metronidazole therapy. Significantly higher microbiological response was demonstrated with paromomycin (OR 3.94, 95% CI 2.75–5.65) and a trend for higher response for clioquinol (OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.68–2.92), compared with metronidazole. Conclusions Limited data compiled in this meta-analysis supports the use of paromomycin or clioquinol for treatment of D. fragilis symptomatic infection, in case a decision to treat this pathogen is taken. Future studies correlating clinical efficacy with microbiological eradication are needed.

Cómo citar

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, N. B. E. (2026). Treatment for Dientamoeba fragilis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-026-01337-0

MLA

al, Nadav Baharav et. "Treatment for Dientamoeba fragilis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis." 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-026-01337-0.

Chicago

al, Nadav Baharav et. 2026. "Treatment for Dientamoeba fragilis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.". https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-026-01337-0.

Harvard

al, N. B. E. 2026, Treatment for Dientamoeba fragilis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, Adis, Springer Healthcare, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-026-01337-0 [Accessed 29 Jun. 2026].

Compartir e imprimir

Guardá la ficha, copiá su enlace permanente o imprimila como PDF.

Exportar referencia

Si usás un gestor bibliográfico, podés exportar el registro en los formatos más comunes.

Detalles del recurso

Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.

Título
Treatment for Dientamoeba fragilis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Autor / colaboradores
Nadav Baharav et al
Editorial
Adis, Springer Healthcare
Año de publicación
2026
ISSN
2193-8229
ISSN
2193-8229
Idioma
eng

Materias

Explorá otros recursos relacionados a partir de estas materias.

Copiado