Torna ai risultati
Scheda bibliografica · Consultazione e accesso
Artículo

JJ stents on extraction string: systematic review and meta-analysis on patients’ outcomes

Lugman Ahmed et al · SpringerOpen · 2026

Accesso aperto disponibile
Lettura rapida. Controlla i dati essenziali della risorsa e accedi al contenuto con il pulsante principale. La scheda mostra solo le informazioni necessarie per identificare, citare e aprire l’opera.

Accesso alla risorsa

Apri il contenuto dall’opzione principale o scegli un’altra fonte disponibile.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Accesso principale

Accesso aperto disponibile

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Apri risorsa

Riepilogo

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Abstract Background Ureteral double-J (JJ) stents are widely used in endourological practice but are frequently associated with discomfort and stent-related morbidity, particularly during removal. Extraction-string stents have been proposed to improve patient experience; however, comparative evidence regarding patient-centered outcomes remains limited. Objective To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials comparing ureteral stents with extraction strings versus conventional stents without strings, focusing on patient-reported outcomes and stent-related complications. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted for randomized controlled trials published between 2010 and 2025. Adult patients undergoing ureteral stent placement following endourological procedures were included. Primary outcomes were pain during stent removal and overall tolerability. Secondary outcomes included urinary tract infection, accidental stent dislodgement, urinary symptoms, and quality of life. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB-2 tool. Where appropriate, quantitative meta-analysis was performed using R with random-effects models. Results Six randomized controlled trials involving 786 patients were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated significantly lower pain during stent removal with extraction-string stents compared with conventional stents (mean difference − 1.42 VAS points, 95% CI − 1.91 to − 0.92). There was no significant difference in urinary tract infection rates between groups. Although extraction-string stents were associated with a higher relative risk of accidental dislodgement, absolute event rates were low, and risk differences were small. Overall quality of life was not adversely affected. Conclusion Extraction-string ureteral stents significantly reduce pain during stent removal without increasing infectious complications. While a small risk of accidental dislodgement exists, extraction-string stents appear to be a safe and effective option for selected adult patients.

Come citare

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, L. A. E. (2026). JJ stents on extraction string: systematic review and meta-analysis on patients’ outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-026-00569-3

MLA

al, Lugman Ahmed et. "JJ stents on extraction string: systematic review and meta-analysis on patients’ outcomes." 2026. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-026-00569-3.

Chicago

al, Lugman Ahmed et. 2026. "JJ stents on extraction string: systematic review and meta-analysis on patients’ outcomes.". https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-026-00569-3.

Harvard

al, L. A. E. 2026, JJ stents on extraction string: systematic review and meta-analysis on patients’ outcomes, SpringerOpen, available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-026-00569-3 [Accessed 9 Aug. 2026].

Condividi e stampa

Salva la scheda, copia il link permanente o stampala in PDF.

Esporta riferimento

Esporta il record nei formati più comuni per usarlo con un gestore bibliografico.

Dettagli della risorsa

Informazioni bibliografiche utili per verificare che sia il materiale corretto.

Titolo
JJ stents on extraction string: systematic review and meta-analysis on patients’ outcomes
Autore / collaboratori
Lugman Ahmed et al
Editore
SpringerOpen
Anno di pubblicazione
2026
ISSN
1961-9987
ISSN
1961-9987
Lingua
Inglés

Soggetti

Esplora risorse correlate a partire da questi soggetti.

Copiato