Torna ai risultati
Scheda bibliografica · Consultazione e accesso
Artículo

Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of ketoprofen 50 mg capsules (Flogofin® & Profenid®) in healthy latin american volunteers

Baldo, M. N. et al · OMICS · 2015

Materiale supplementare disponibile
Lettura rapida. Controlla i dati essenziali della risorsa e accedi al contenuto con il pulsante principale. La scheda mostra solo le informazioni necessarie per identificare, citare e aprire l’opera.

Accesso alla risorsa

Apri il contenuto dall’opzione principale o scegli un’altra fonte disponibile.

CONICET Digital CONICET Digital OAI-PMH
Entrar por CONICET Digital
Accesso principale

Materiale supplementare disponibile

El enlace apunta a material asociado, anexos, tablas, datos o página complementaria. No se marca como libro/texto completo.
Apri materiale

Riepilogo

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

The study was performed to compare the bioavailability of two ketoprofen capsule (50 mg) formulations: Flogofin®, as test formulation, and Profenid®, as reference formulation. The study was conducted open with randomized two period crossover design and 1 week washout period in 24 fasting, healthy latino-american male volunteers and performed at the Biopharmaceutical Research Center Dominguez Lab. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 24 h and plasma was separated and analyzed for ketoprofen, using a sensitive, reproducible, and accurate method by liquid chromatography ? tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Pharmacokinetic parameters: AUC0-24, AUC0-∞, Cmax, Tmax, T1/2 and Ke, were analyzed from plasma concentrations of both formulations. The means AUC0-24 for test and reference formulation were 50.21 ([μg h]/mL) - 50.28 ([μgh]/mL), 52.38 ([μg h]/mL) - 50.84 ([μg h]/mL) for AUC0-∞, and 21.58 μg/mL - 21.65 μg/mL for Cmax, respectively. Statistical modules (ANOVA and 90% confidence intervals) were applied to AUC0?24, AUC0-∞, and Cmax to assess the bioequivalence of the two brands which revealed no significant difference between them, and 90% CI fell within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80%-125%. Based on these statistical inferences, both formulations were found to be bioequivalent. Fil: Baldo, M. N.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Santa Fe. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral; Argentina. Dominguez Lab; Argentina Fil: Hunzicker, Gabriel Alejandro. Dominguez Lab; Argentina

Come citare

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

Baldo, M. N. E. A. (2015). Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of ketoprofen 50 mg capsules (Flogofin® & Profenid®) in healthy latin american volunteers. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/9909

MLA

Baldo, M. N. et al. "Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of ketoprofen 50 mg capsules (Flogofin® & Profenid®) in healthy latin american volunteers." 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/9909.

Chicago

Baldo, M. N. et al. 2015. "Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of ketoprofen 50 mg capsules (Flogofin® & Profenid®) in healthy latin american volunteers.". http://hdl.handle.net/11336/9909.

Harvard

Baldo, M. N. E. A. 2015, Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of ketoprofen 50 mg capsules (Flogofin® & Profenid®) in healthy latin american volunteers, OMICS, available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/9909 [Accessed 9 Aug. 2026].

Condividi e stampa

Salva la scheda, copia il link permanente o stampala in PDF.

Esporta riferimento

Esporta il record nei formati più comuni per usarlo con un gestore bibliografico.

Dettagli della risorsa

Informazioni bibliografiche utili per verificare che sia il materiale corretto.

Titolo
Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of ketoprofen 50 mg capsules (Flogofin® & Profenid®) in healthy latin american volunteers
Autore / collaboratori
Baldo, M. N. et al
Editore
OMICS
Anno di pubblicazione
2015
ISSN
0975-0851
ISSN
0975-0851
Lingua
Inglés

Soggetti

Esplora risorse correlate a partire da questi soggetti.

Copiato