← Volver a resultados
Ficha bibliográfica · Consulta y acceso
Artículo

Comparative analysis of the ability of a set of CMIP3 and CMIP5 global climate models to represent precipitation in South America

Gulizia, Carla et al · John Wiley & Sons Ltd · 2015

Acceso abierto al texto completo
Lectura rápida. Revisá los datos básicos del recurso y luego accedé al contenido desde el botón principal. En esta ficha solo se muestra la información necesaria para identificar la obra, citarla y abrirla.

Acceso al recurso

Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.

Acceso principal

Acceso abierto al texto completo

Texto completo identificado como acceso abierto.
Abrir texto

Resumen

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the ability of two sets of global climate models derived from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Projects Phase 3 (CMIP3) and Phase 5 (CMIP5) to represent the summer, winter, and annual precipitation mean patterns in South America south of the equator and in three particular sub-regions, between years 1960 and 1999. Different metrics (relative bias, spatial correlation, RMSE, and relative errors) were calculated and compared between both projects in order to determine if there has been improvement from CMIP3 to CMIP5 models in the representation of regional rainfall. Results from this analysis indicate that for the analyzed seasons, precipitation simulated by both CMIP3 and CMIP5 models' ensembles exhibited some differences. In DJF the relative bias over Amazonia, central South America, eastern Argentina and Uruguay is reduced in CMIP5 compared to CMIP3. In JJA, the same occurs in some areas of Amazonia. Annual precipitation is also better represented by the CMIP5 than CMIP3 GCMs as they underestimate precipitation to a lesser extent, although in NE Brazil the overestimation values are much larger in CMIP5 than in CMIP3 analysis. In line with previous studies, the multi-model ensembles show the best representation of the observed patterns in most seasons and regions. Only in some cases, single GCMs (MIROC3.2(hires) -CMIP3- and MIROC4h -CMIP5-) presented better results than the ensemble. The high horizontal resolution of these models suggests that this could be a relevant issue for a more adequate estimation of rainfall at least in the analyzed regions. Fil: Gulizia, Carla. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Centro de Investigaciones del Mar y la Atmósfera. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Centro de Investigaciones del Mar y la Atmósfera; Argentina. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Francia Fil: Camilloni, Ines Angela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Centro de Investigaciones del Mar y la Atmósfera. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Centro de Investigaciones del Mar y la Atmósfera; Argentina. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Francia

Cómo citar

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

Gulizia, C. E. A. (2015). Comparative analysis of the ability of a set of CMIP3 and CMIP5 global climate models to represent precipitation in South America. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/42037

MLA

Gulizia, Carla et al. "Comparative analysis of the ability of a set of CMIP3 and CMIP5 global climate models to represent precipitation in South America." 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/42037.

Chicago

Gulizia, Carla et al. 2015. "Comparative analysis of the ability of a set of CMIP3 and CMIP5 global climate models to represent precipitation in South America.". http://hdl.handle.net/11336/42037.

Harvard

Gulizia, C. E. A. 2015, Comparative analysis of the ability of a set of CMIP3 and CMIP5 global climate models to represent precipitation in South America, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/42037 [Accessed 29 Jun. 2026].

Compartir e imprimir

Guardá la ficha, copiá su enlace permanente o imprimila como PDF.

Exportar referencia

Si usás un gestor bibliográfico, podés exportar el registro en los formatos más comunes.

Detalles del recurso

Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.

Título
Comparative analysis of the ability of a set of CMIP3 and CMIP5 global climate models to represent precipitation in South America
Autor / colaboradores
Gulizia, Carla et al
Editorial
John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Año de publicación
2015
ISSN
0899-8418
ISSN
0899-8418
Idioma
eng

Materias

Explorá otros recursos relacionados a partir de estas materias.

Copiado