← Volver a resultados
Ficha bibliográfica · Consulta y acceso
Artículo

Differential responses of three grasses to defoliation, water and light availability

Altesor, Alice et al · Springer · 2017

Acceso abierto al texto completo
Lectura rápida. Revisá los datos básicos del recurso y luego accedé al contenido desde el botón principal. En esta ficha solo se muestra la información necesaria para identificar la obra, citarla y abrirla.

Acceso al recurso

Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.

Acceso principal

Acceso abierto al texto completo

Texto completo identificado como acceso abierto.
Abrir texto

Resumen

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Grazing not only modifies the structure and functioning of grasslands, it also changes micro-environmental conditions that alter the availability of resources. The aim of this study was to analyze the response of grasses with different photosynthetic pathways (C3/C4), growth forms (prostrate/erect), and grazing responses (increaser/decreaser) to defoliation and resource availability. In a greenhouse, we performed a factorial experiment with three factors: defoliation, light, and water and three species: Axonopus affinis (C4 prostrate, increaser), Coelorachis selloana (C4 erect, decreaser), and Bromus auleticus (C3 erect, decreaser). We measured the relative growth rate (RGR), biomass assignment, and specific leaf area. The RGR of both C4 species was affected by light availability, while the decreaser C3 did not respond to any factor. Biomass allocation to leaves and stolons changed with the interaction between light and water in the C4 prostrate species (increaser). In the C4 erect grass (decreaser), biomass allocation was more affected by defoliation under low levels of light and water. Low light availability and defoliation reduced the assignment to leaves, while the allocation to rhizomes increased. Species-specific responses to resources availability that are modified by grazing were related to photosynthetic pathway, growth form, and grazing responses. Biomass allocation was related to strategies to avoid and/or tolerate grazing. The investment to leaves was limited by light and water availability in prostrate species, while in erect grasses it was controlled by defoliation and water availability. Our results highlight the importance of species responses to changes in resource availability associated to grazing regimes.
Fil: Altesor, Alice. Universidad de la República; Uruguay
Fil: Leoni, Elsa. Universidad de la República; Uruguay

Cómo citar

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

Altesor, A. E. A. (2017). Differential responses of three grasses to defoliation, water and light availability. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/66101

MLA

Altesor, Alice et al. "Differential responses of three grasses to defoliation, water and light availability." 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/66101.

Chicago

Altesor, Alice et al. 2017. "Differential responses of three grasses to defoliation, water and light availability.". http://hdl.handle.net/11336/66101.

Harvard

Altesor, A. E. A. 2017, Differential responses of three grasses to defoliation, water and light availability, Springer, available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/66101 [Accessed 25 Jun. 2026].

Compartir e imprimir

Guardá la ficha, copiá su enlace permanente o imprimila como PDF.

Exportar referencia

Si usás un gestor bibliográfico, podés exportar el registro en los formatos más comunes.

Detalles del recurso

Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.

Título
Differential responses of three grasses to defoliation, water and light availability
Autor / colaboradores
Altesor, Alice et al
Editorial
Springer
Año de publicación
2017
ISSN
1385-0237
ISSN
1385-0237
Idioma
eng

Materias

Explorá otros recursos relacionados a partir de estas materias.

Copiado