‘Mind the Gap’: Assessing Differences between Brazilian and Mainstream IR Journals in Methodological Approaches

Artículo

‘Mind the Gap’: Assessing Differences between Brazilian and Mainstream IR Journals in Methodological Approaches

Thales Carvalho et al · Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais · 2021

Acceso abierto disponible

Lectura rápida. Revisá los datos básicos del recurso y luego accedé al contenido desde el botón principal. En esta ficha solo se muestra la información necesaria para identificar la obra, citarla y abrirla.

Autor / responsable

Thales Carvalho et al

Editorial

Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais

Año

2021

ISSN

1982-0240

ISSN

1982-0240

Idioma

eng

Acceso al recurso

Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.

Acceso principal

Acceso abierto disponible

DOAJ DOAJ - Open Access Journals

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.

Abrir recurso

Resumen

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Abstract In this article, we assess the methodological approaches employed in articles published in Brazilian and global mainstream IR journals in order to observe the differences between the two. To this end, we compare the methodological tools applied in research articles published in the top two Brazilian journals (Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional and Contexto Internacional) vis-à-vis two other top international influential mainstream publications (International Organization and World Politics), from the year 2009 to 2019. By undertaking a Systematic Literature Review, we surveyed a total of 955 articles. Our research concluded that Brazilian IR scholarship differs from the mainstream literature because (1) most articles do not mention the mobilized methods during their analyses, (2) the field of IR presents more non- and post-positivist approaches, and (3) contrary to the mainstream outlets, quantitative methods are rarely employed in Brazil.

Cómo citar

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, T. C. E. (2021). ‘Mind the Gap’: Assessing Differences between Brazilian and Mainstream IR Journals in Methodological Approaches. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.2019430300002

MLA

al, Thales Carvalho et. "‘Mind the Gap’: Assessing Differences between Brazilian and Mainstream IR Journals in Methodological Approaches." 2021. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.2019430300002.

Chicago

al, Thales Carvalho et. 2021. "‘Mind the Gap’: Assessing Differences between Brazilian and Mainstream IR Journals in Methodological Approaches.". https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.2019430300002.

Harvard

al, T. C. E. 2021, ‘Mind the Gap’: Assessing Differences between Brazilian and Mainstream IR Journals in Methodological Approaches, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais, available at: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.2019430300002 [Accessed 24 Jun. 2026].

Compartir e imprimir

Guardá la ficha, copiá su enlace permanente o imprimila como PDF.

Exportar referencia

Si usás un gestor bibliográfico, podés exportar el registro en los formatos más comunes.

RIS BibTeX

Detalles del recurso

Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.

Título: ‘Mind the Gap’: Assessing Differences between Brazilian and Mainstream IR Journals in Methodological Approaches

Autor / colaboradores: Thales Carvalho et al

Editorial: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais

Año de publicación: 2021

ISSN: 1982-0240

ISSN: 1982-0240

Idioma: eng

Materias

Explorá otros recursos relacionados a partir de estas materias.

methodology; International Relations; Brazil; scholarly production; systematic literature review.