Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?
Wass, Val et al · SEDICI UNLP · 2009
Acceso al recurso
Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.
Material complementario disponible
Resumen
Descripción general del contenido del recurso.
Setting: A final undergraduate medical school examination for 214 students.
Aim: To estimate the overall reliability of a composite examination, the correlations between the tests, and the effect of differences in test length, number of items and weighting of the results on the reliability.
Method: The examination consisted of four written and two clinical tests: multiple-choice questions (MCQ) test, extended matching questions (EMQ), shortanswer questions (SAQ), essays, an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) and history-taking long cases. Multivariate generalizability theory was used to estimate the composite reliability of the examination and the effects of item weighting and test length.
Results: The composite reliability of the examination was 0-77, if all tests contributed equally. Correlations between examination components varied, suggesting that different theoretically interpretable parameters of competence were being tested. Weighting tests according to items per test or total test time gave improved reliabilities of 0-93 and 0-81, respectively.
Double weighting of the clinical component marginally affected the reliability (0-76).
Conclusion: This composite final examination achieved an overall reliability sufficient for high-stakes decisions on student clinical competence. However, examination structure must be carefully planned and results combined with caution. Weighting according to number of items or test length significantly affected reliability. The components testing different aspects of knowledge and clinical skills must be carefully balanced to ensure both content validity and parity between items and test length.
Selección de trabajos ya publicados sobre los que se trabajó en los talleres de las Jornadas de Educación Médica
Sociedad de Educación Medica de La Plata
Cómo citar
Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.
APA 7
Wass, V. E. A. (2009). Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?. http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/8525
MLA
Wass, Val et al. "Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?." 2009. http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/8525.
Chicago
Wass, Val et al. 2009. "Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?.". http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/8525.
Harvard
Wass, V. E. A. 2009, Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?, SEDICI UNLP, available at: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/8525 [Accessed 28 Jun. 2026].
Detalles del recurso
Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.
- Título
- Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?
- Autor / colaboradores
- Wass, Val et al
- Editorial
- SEDICI UNLP
- Año de publicación
- 2009
- Idioma
- en
Materias
Explorá otros recursos relacionados a partir de estas materias.