← Volver a resultados
Ficha bibliográfica · Consulta y acceso
Artículo

Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?

Wass, Val et al · SEDICI UNLP · 2009

Material complementario disponible
Lectura rápida. Revisá los datos básicos del recurso y luego accedé al contenido desde el botón principal. En esta ficha solo se muestra la información necesaria para identificar la obra, citarla y abrirla.

Acceso al recurso

Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.

Acceso principal

Material complementario disponible

El enlace apunta a material asociado, anexos, tablas, datos o página complementaria. No se marca como libro/texto completo.
Abrir material

Resumen

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Background: Clinical examinations increasingly consist of composite tests to assess all aspects of the curriculum recommended by the General Medical Council.
Setting: A final undergraduate medical school examination for 214 students.
Aim: To estimate the overall reliability of a composite examination, the correlations between the tests, and the effect of differences in test length, number of items and weighting of the results on the reliability.
Method: The examination consisted of four written and two clinical tests: multiple-choice questions (MCQ) test, extended matching questions (EMQ), shortanswer questions (SAQ), essays, an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) and history-taking long cases. Multivariate generalizability theory was used to estimate the composite reliability of the examination and the effects of item weighting and test length.
Results: The composite reliability of the examination was 0-77, if all tests contributed equally. Correlations between examination components varied, suggesting that different theoretically interpretable parameters of competence were being tested. Weighting tests according to items per test or total test time gave improved reliabilities of 0-93 and 0-81, respectively.
Double weighting of the clinical component marginally affected the reliability (0-76).
Conclusion: This composite final examination achieved an overall reliability sufficient for high-stakes decisions on student clinical competence. However, examination structure must be carefully planned and results combined with caution. Weighting according to number of items or test length significantly affected reliability. The components testing different aspects of knowledge and clinical skills must be carefully balanced to ensure both content validity and parity between items and test length.
Selección de trabajos ya publicados sobre los que se trabajó en los talleres de las Jornadas de Educación Médica
Sociedad de Educación Medica de La Plata

Cómo citar

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

Wass, V. E. A. (2009). Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?. http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/8525

MLA

Wass, Val et al. "Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?." 2009. http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/8525.

Chicago

Wass, Val et al. 2009. "Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?.". http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/8525.

Harvard

Wass, V. E. A. 2009, Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?, SEDICI UNLP, available at: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/8525 [Accessed 28 Jun. 2026].

Compartir e imprimir

Guardá la ficha, copiá su enlace permanente o imprimila como PDF.

Exportar referencia

Si usás un gestor bibliográfico, podés exportar el registro en los formatos más comunes.

Detalles del recurso

Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.

Título
Composite undergraduate clinical examinations: how should the components be combined to maximize reliability?
Autor / colaboradores
Wass, Val et al
Editorial
SEDICI UNLP
Año de publicación
2009
Idioma
en

Materias

Explorá otros recursos relacionados a partir de estas materias.

Copiado