← Volver a resultados
Ficha bibliográfica · Consulta y acceso
Artículo

Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda

Enola K. Proctor; Hiie Silmere; Ramesh Raghavan; Peter S. Hovmand; Greg Aarons; Alicia C. Bunger; Richard T. Griffey; Melissa A. Hensley · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · 2010

Página del recurso
Lectura rápida. Revisá los datos básicos del recurso y luego accedé al contenido desde el botón principal. En esta ficha solo se muestra la información necesaria para identificar la obra, citarla y abrirla.

Acceso al recurso

Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.

Acceso principal

Página del recurso

Página de referencia del recurso. El texto completo no está confirmado automáticamente.
Abrir recurso

Resumen

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

An unresolved issue in the field of implementation research is how to conceptualize and evaluate successful implementation. This paper advances the concept of "implementation outcomes" distinct from service system and clinical treatment outcomes. This paper proposes a heuristic, working "taxonomy" of eight conceptually distinct implementation outcomes-acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability-along with their nominal definitions. We propose a two-pronged agenda for research on implementation outcomes. Conceptualizing and measuring implementation outcomes will advance understanding of implementation processes, enhance efficiency in implementation research, and pave the way for studies of the comparative effectiveness of implementation strategies.

Cómo citar

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

Proctor, E. K, Silmere, H, Raghavan, R, Hovmand, P. S, Aarons, G, Bunger, A. C, Griffey, R. T, & Hensley, M. A. (2010). Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7

MLA

Proctor, Enola K, et al. "Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda." 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.

Chicago

Proctor, Enola K, Hiie Silmere, Ramesh Raghavan, Peter S. Hovmand, Greg Aarons, Alicia C. Bunger, Richard T. Griffey, and Melissa A. Hensley. 2010. "Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda.". https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.

Harvard

Proctor, E. K. et al. 2010, Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7 [Accessed 28 Jun. 2026].

Compartir e imprimir

Guardá la ficha, copiá su enlace permanente o imprimila como PDF.

Exportar referencia

Si usás un gestor bibliográfico, podés exportar el registro en los formatos más comunes.

Detalles del recurso

Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.

Título
Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda
Autor / colaboradores
Enola K. Proctor; Hiie Silmere; Ramesh Raghavan; Peter S. Hovmand; Greg Aarons; Alicia C. Bunger; Richard T. Griffey; Melissa A. Hensley
Editorial
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Año de publicación
2010
Idioma
en

Materias

Explorá otros recursos relacionados a partir de estas materias.

Copiado