← Volver a resultados
Ficha bibliográfica · Consulta y acceso
Artículo

Whitehead versus Dewey: O filosofii, rytmu a estetické zkušenosti

Martin Kaplický · Karolinum Press · 2018

Material complementario disponible
Lectura rápida. Revisá los datos básicos del recurso y luego accedé al contenido desde el botón principal. En esta ficha solo se muestra la información necesaria para identificar la obra, citarla y abrirla.

Acceso al recurso

Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.

Acceso principal

Material complementario disponible

El enlace apunta a material asociado, anexos, tablas, datos o página complementaria. No se marca como libro/texto completo.
Abrir material

Resumen

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

In their philosophical works Alfred North Whitehead and John Dewey criticize philosophical conceptions that consider the stability of the outer world to be a basic characteristic of reality and conceive of change only as its secondary feature. Both Dewey and Whitehead emphasize that different kinds of process underlie the existence of seemingly stable and unchanging objects. Consequently, both men are considered to be process philosophers. Their philosophical systems harmonize in many respects. It is surprising, then, that in their philosophical writings they rarely mention each other. This article has three main aims. Its first part is a discussion of how and where the two philosophers do in fact refer to each other, and it seeks to show how they reflect on their similarities and differences. We see their strong mutual respect but also criticism. Whitehead claims that Dewey’s philosophy plays it too safe, is not metaphysically bold enough. Dewey has reservations about Whitehead’s ‘eternal object’, which, he argues, seems to bring static idealism into Whitehead’s philosophy. The second part deals with the concept of rhythm as the main ontological principle for both philosophers, and seeks to show that their treatment of this concept is strongly analogical, expressing not the repetition of the same element, but the fusion of order and novelty. The third part of the article seeks to demonstrate that for both philosophers rhythm is not only an ontological principle, but also the basic characteristic of aesthetic experience. This fact gives a strong aesthetic tinge to the philosophical systems of both Whitehead and Dewey.

Cómo citar

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

Kaplický, M. (2018). Whitehead versus Dewey: O filosofii, rytmu a estetické zkušenosti. https://doi.org/10.14712/24647055.2017.20

MLA

Kaplický, Martin. "Whitehead versus Dewey: O filosofii, rytmu a estetické zkušenosti." 2018. https://doi.org/10.14712/24647055.2017.20.

Chicago

Kaplický, Martin. 2018. "Whitehead versus Dewey: O filosofii, rytmu a estetické zkušenosti.". https://doi.org/10.14712/24647055.2017.20.

Harvard

Kaplický, M. 2018, Whitehead versus Dewey: O filosofii, rytmu a estetické zkušenosti, Karolinum Press, available at: https://doi.org/10.14712/24647055.2017.20 [Accessed 29 Jun. 2026].

Compartir e imprimir

Guardá la ficha, copiá su enlace permanente o imprimila como PDF.

Exportar referencia

Si usás un gestor bibliográfico, podés exportar el registro en los formatos más comunes.

Detalles del recurso

Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.

Título
Whitehead versus Dewey: O filosofii, rytmu a estetické zkušenosti
Autor / colaboradores
Martin Kaplický
Editorial
Karolinum Press
Año de publicación
2018
ISSN
0567-8293
ISSN
0567-8293
Idioma
ces

Materias

Explorá otros recursos relacionados a partir de estas materias.

Copiado