Volver a resultados
Ficha bibliográfica · Consulta y acceso
Artículo

Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching

Paul A. Kirschner; John Sweller; Richard E. Clark · Educational Psychologist · 2006

Página del recurso
Lectura rápida. Revisá los datos básicos del recurso y luego accedé al contenido desde el botón principal. En esta ficha solo se muestra la información necesaria para identificar la obra, citarla y abrirla.

Acceso al recurso

Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.

OpenAlex OpenAlex Works
Entrar por OpenAlex
Acceso principal

Página del recurso

Página de referencia del recurso. El texto completo no está confirmado automáticamente.
Abrir recurso

Resumen

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Evidence for the superiority of guided instruction is explained in the context of our knowledge of human cognitive architecture, expert-novice differences, and cognitive load. Although un-guided or minimally guided instructional approaches are very popular and intuitively appealing, the point is made that these approaches ignore both the structures that constitute human cognitive architecture and evidence from empirical studies over the past half-century that consistently indicate that minimally guided instruction is less effective and less efficient than instructional approaches that place a strong emphasis on guidance of the student learning process. The advantage of guidance begins to recede only when learners have sufficiently high prior knowledge to provide `internal` guidance. Recent developments in instructional research and instructional design models that support guidance during instruction are briefly described.

Cómo citar

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

Kirschner, P. A, Sweller, J, & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

MLA

Kirschner, Paul A, et al. "Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching." 2006. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.

Chicago

Kirschner, Paul A, John Sweller, and Richard E. Clark. 2006. "Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching.". https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.

Harvard

Kirschner, P. A, Sweller, J. and Clark, R. E. 2006, Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching, Educational Psychologist, available at: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1 [Accessed 5 Aug. 2026].

Compartir e imprimir

Guardá la ficha, copiá su enlace permanente o imprimila como PDF.

Exportar referencia

Si usás un gestor bibliográfico, podés exportar el registro en los formatos más comunes.

Detalles del recurso

Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.

Título
Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching
Autor / colaboradores
Paul A. Kirschner; John Sweller; Richard E. Clark
Editorial
Educational Psychologist
Año de publicación
2006
Idioma
Inglés

Materias

Explorá otros recursos relacionados a partir de estas materias.

Copiado