Volver a resultados
Ficha bibliográfica · Consulta y acceso
Artículo

Assessment and Recognition of MOOCs: The State of the Art

Rob Farrow et al · Humber Polytechnic Press · 2021

Acceso abierto al texto completo
Lectura rápida. Revisá los datos básicos del recurso y luego accedé al contenido desde el botón principal. En esta ficha solo se muestra la información necesaria para identificar la obra, citarla y abrirla.

Acceso al recurso

Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Acceso principal

Acceso abierto al texto completo

Texto completo identificado como acceso abierto.
Abrir texto

Resumen

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Verification of learner identity is increasingly important for online education in examination and proctoring, and the Covid-19 pandemic has encouraged many institutions to move to online examinations at scale. This paper reviews state of the art approaches to ID verification, recognition and assessment in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC). Desktop research included research publications, grey literature and MOOC platforms to identify current practices. The main focus was on public data from course pages on MOOC platforms, particularly courses that had been grouped to offer a single academic program, Four approaches are identified: basic ID checks, checks made by the university, proctoring and various types of interview. Our review demonstrates the absence of any universal approach. However, the emergent picture shows increasing co-ordination across relevant stakeholders (including higher education institutions, employment services and the private sector). Several more coordinated strategies (such as Europe’s Common Microcredential Framework) are highlighted. There remain significant challenges for online proctoring, including overcoming learner preferences and meeting the increased resourcing needed for human-led processes of identity verification. There remain significant ethical challenges regarding the use of learner data (especially biometrics). MOOC platforms would likely benefit from adopting strategies that are well-established in higher education institutions such as plagiarism checking software and pedagogies like e-portfolios.

Cómo citar

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, R. F. E. (2021). Assessment and Recognition of MOOCs: The State of the Art. https://doi.org/10.69520/jipe.v3i1.94

MLA

al, Rob Farrow et. "Assessment and Recognition of MOOCs: The State of the Art." 2021. https://doi.org/10.69520/jipe.v3i1.94.

Chicago

al, Rob Farrow et. 2021. "Assessment and Recognition of MOOCs: The State of the Art.". https://doi.org/10.69520/jipe.v3i1.94.

Harvard

al, R. F. E. 2021, Assessment and Recognition of MOOCs: The State of the Art, Humber Polytechnic Press, available at: https://doi.org/10.69520/jipe.v3i1.94 [Accessed 5 Aug. 2026].

Compartir e imprimir

Guardá la ficha, copiá su enlace permanente o imprimila como PDF.

Exportar referencia

Si usás un gestor bibliográfico, podés exportar el registro en los formatos más comunes.

Detalles del recurso

Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.

Título
Assessment and Recognition of MOOCs: The State of the Art
Autor / colaboradores
Rob Farrow et al
Editorial
Humber Polytechnic Press
Año de publicación
2021
ISSN
2561-5904
ISSN
2561-5904
Idioma
Inglés
Copiado