Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo de revista

Comparison of Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Agriculture Monitoring

Joseph Cerreta et al · Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University · 2019

Open access available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.
Serial publication

3D Printing Technology in Aerospace Industry – A Review

This serial publication contains 428 related contents.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Open access available

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Open resource

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

<p>Florida citrus growers need inexpensive methods to observe citrus plants to detect disease and stress consistently. Health vegetation indices, such as the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) collected from Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), can be used to identify variation in plant health. Simple-to-operate UAS may enable growers to determine within-field variation more frequently than with inspections from scouts, providing more frequent knowledge about the crop condition. This research compared two low-cost fixed-wing UAS, a $5,000 Parrot Disco Pro Ag and a $16,690 senseFly eBee, each equipped with a Parrot Sequoia multispectral camera, to determine if there were differences in the NDVI data results and ease of operation. There were no statistical differences between NDVI reflectance values obtained using the Disco Pro Ag (M = 0.62, SD = 0.15) and the eBee (M = 0.60, SD = 0.15), <em>t</em>(45) = -1.45; <em>p</em> = 0.15. There was a significant positive correlation between the datasets (Pearson correlation = 0.963, <em>p</em> = 0.00). These results suggest that both the Disco Pro Ag and eBee were equally capable of producing the same data from the Parrot Sequoia multispectral camera. Differences in mobility and methods of waypoint planning between these two low-cost UAS may provide remote pilots with different styles of operation. As growers continue to adopt UAS technology to understand their fields better, the characteristics of each system will be important for quick setup time and ease of use.</p>

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, J. C. E. (2019). Comparison of Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Agriculture Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2019.1337

MLA

al, Joseph Cerreta et. "Comparison of Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Agriculture Monitoring." 2019. https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2019.1337.

Chicago

al, Joseph Cerreta et. 2019. "Comparison of Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Agriculture Monitoring.". https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2019.1337.

Harvard

al, J. C. E. 2019, Comparison of Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Agriculture Monitoring, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, available at: https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2019.1337 [Accessed 8 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Comparison of Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Agriculture Monitoring
Author / contributors
Joseph Cerreta et al
Publisher
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
Publication year
2019
ISSN
2374-6793
ISSN
2374-6793
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied