Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Balancing environmental benefits and agricultural technologies – perspectives from German consumers

Johanna Garnitz et al · FrancoAngeli · 2026

Supplementary material available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Supplementary material available

El enlace apunta a material asociado, anexos, tablas, datos o página complementaria. No se marca como libro/texto completo.
Open material

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Societal and political voices call for stronger environmental protection, biodiversity conservation, and reduced pesticide use. Integrating digital farming technologies into farming systems like strip intercropping offers promising pathways toward more sustainable and efficient food production. The successful adoption of these innovations depends on acceptance by both farmers and consumers. To explore these intersections of technology, sustainability, and market dynamics from a consumer perspective, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) followed by consumer segmentation was conducted in Germany. The study examines preferences for different farming systems, focusing on autonomous machinery, landscape structure, food prices, and environmental factors. Sociodemographic variables, along with value- and attitude-based factors, were used to differentiate consumer segments. The study highlights social preferences for welfare-enhancing agricultural systems, such as strip intercropping, and demonstrates a societal demand for more sustainable agroecosystem outcomes, in terms of biodiversity, soil erosion prevention and reduced use of chemical-synthetic pesticides. Results show that the balance between environmental benefits and agricultural technology differs markedly across four consumer segments, underscoring the need to integrate ecological and technological dimensions in communication and policy for enhancing consumer acceptance and support sustainable transitions in agriculture.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, J. G. E. (2026). Balancing environmental benefits and agricultural technologies – perspectives from German consumers. https://doi.org/10.3280/ecag2026oa21109

MLA

al, Johanna Garnitz et. "Balancing environmental benefits and agricultural technologies – perspectives from German consumers." 2026. https://doi.org/10.3280/ecag2026oa21109.

Chicago

al, Johanna Garnitz et. 2026. "Balancing environmental benefits and agricultural technologies – perspectives from German consumers.". https://doi.org/10.3280/ecag2026oa21109.

Harvard

al, J. G. E. 2026, Balancing environmental benefits and agricultural technologies – perspectives from German consumers, FrancoAngeli, available at: https://doi.org/10.3280/ecag2026oa21109 [Accessed 6 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Balancing environmental benefits and agricultural technologies – perspectives from German consumers
Author / contributors
Johanna Garnitz et al
Publisher
FrancoAngeli
Publication year
2026
ISSN
1972-4802
ISSN
1972-4802
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied