Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Evaluating methods for high‐resolution, national‐scale seagrass mapping in Google Earth Engine

Matthew Floyd et al · Wiley · 2026

Open access available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Open access available

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Open resource

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Abstract National‐scale benthic marine habitat maps underpin monitoring and conservation of vulnerable marine and coastal ecosystems. Cloud‐based satellite remote sensing can streamline these processes over spatial scales that would otherwise be financially and logistically challenging. Here, we test the sensitivity of mapped outputs to three key methodological choices when generating open‐source cloud‐based satellite maps of seagrass meadows: (1) period of image retrieval (seasonality, tested at n = 7 sites over n = 5 years); (2) machine learning classification method (SVM, RF, CART) over a range of training pixel densities (n = 12 points with 0.0004–0.8757 training points/km2) and (3) input satellite data choice (n = 3: Landsat 8, Planet NICFI and Sentinel‐2). We found that in the Maldives, when using best available cloud masking methods, monsoonal cloud patterns introduce noise into satellite images, with implications for mapping accuracy. Comparing methods at the classification phase, Overall Accuracy (OA) was similar between classification methods, though SVM performed best (OA = 84.6%). We also determined that workflows using data derived from Sentinel‐2 resulted in the most accurate binary thematic seagrass map (OA = 80.3%), compared to Landsat 8 and Planet NICFI (OA = 72.7 and 74.8%, respectively). These results indicate that data source has a larger effect on OA than classifier type, and therefore should be the primary consideration for map producers. We further recommend that, as studies increasingly work over larger extents (i.e. >1,000 km2), the minimum density of points used to train a binary classification of seagrass from Sentinel‐2 data ought to be 0.67/km2. We present an open‐source (for non‐commercial uses) workflow for generating high‐resolution national‐scale seagrass maps. Insights from this work can be applied in other settings globally to improve outcomes for marine planning and international targets on climate change and the conservation of biodiversity.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, M. F. E. (2026). Evaluating methods for high‐resolution, national‐scale seagrass mapping in Google Earth Engine. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.70039

MLA

al, Matthew Floyd et. "Evaluating methods for high‐resolution, national‐scale seagrass mapping in Google Earth Engine." 2026. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.70039.

Chicago

al, Matthew Floyd et. 2026. "Evaluating methods for high‐resolution, national‐scale seagrass mapping in Google Earth Engine.". https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.70039.

Harvard

al, M. F. E. 2026, Evaluating methods for high‐resolution, national‐scale seagrass mapping in Google Earth Engine, Wiley, available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.70039 [Accessed 8 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Evaluating methods for high‐resolution, national‐scale seagrass mapping in Google Earth Engine
Author / contributors
Matthew Floyd et al
Publisher
Wiley
Publication year
2026
ISSN
2056-3485
ISSN
2056-3485
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied