Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water

William L. Jorgensen; Jayaraman Chandrasekhar; Jeffry D. Madura; Roger Impey; Michael L. Klein · The Journal of Chemical Physics · 1983

Resource page
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

OpenAlex OpenAlex Works
Entrar por OpenAlex
Main access

Resource page

Resource reference page. Full text availability has not been automatically confirmed.
Open resource

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Classical Monte Carlo simulations have been carried out for liquid water in the NPT ensemble at 25 °C and 1 atm using six of the simpler intermolecular potential functions for the water dimer: Bernal–Fowler (BF), SPC, ST2, TIPS2, TIP3P, and TIP4P. Comparisons are made with experimental thermodynamic and structural data including the recent neutron diffraction results of Thiessen and Narten. The computed densities and potential energies are in reasonable accord with experiment except for the original BF model, which yields an 18% overestimate of the density and poor structural results. The TIPS2 and TIP4P potentials yield oxygen–oxygen partial structure functions in good agreement with the neutron diffraction results. The accord with the experimental OH and HH partial structure functions is poorer; however, the computed results for these functions are similar for all the potential functions. Consequently, the discrepancy may be due to the correction terms needed in processing the neutron data or to an effect uniformly neglected in the computations. Comparisons are also made for self-diffusion coefficients obtained from molecular dynamics simulations. Overall, the SPC, ST2, TIPS2, and TIP4P models give reasonable structural and thermodynamic descriptions of liquid water and they should be useful in simulations of aqueous solutions. The simplicity of the SPC, TIPS2, and TIP4P functions is also attractive from a computational standpoint.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

Jorgensen, W. L, Chandrasekhar, J, Madura, J. D, Impey, R, & Klein, M. L. (1983). Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.445869

MLA

Jorgensen, William L, et al. "Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water." 1983. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.445869.

Chicago

Jorgensen, William L, Jayaraman Chandrasekhar, Jeffry D. Madura, Roger Impey, and Michael L. Klein. 1983. "Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water.". https://doi.org/10.1063/1.445869.

Harvard

Jorgensen, W. L. et al. 1983, Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water, The Journal of Chemical Physics, available at: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.445869 [Accessed 8 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water
Author / contributors
William L. Jorgensen; Jayaraman Chandrasekhar; Jeffry D. Madura; Roger Impey; Michael L. Klein
Publisher
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Publication year
1983
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied