Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Classification of Surgical Complications

Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien · Annals of Surgery · 2004

Resource page
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

OpenAlex OpenAlex Works
Entrar por OpenAlex
Main access

Resource page

Resource reference page. Full text availability has not been automatically confirmed.
Open resource

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

In Brief Objective: Although quality assessment is gaining increasing attention, there is still no consensus on how to define and grade postoperative complications. This shortcoming hampers comparison of outcome data among different centers and therapies and over time. Patients and Methods: A classification of complications published by one of the authors in 1992 was critically re-evaluated and modified to increase its accuracy and its acceptability in the surgical community. Modifications mainly focused on the manner of reporting life-threatening and permanently disabling complications. The new grading system still mostly relies on the therapy used to treat the complication. The classification was tested in a cohort of 6336 patients who underwent elective general surgery at our institution. The reproducibility and personal judgment of the classification were evaluated through an international survey with 2 questionnaires sent to 10 surgical centers worldwide. Results: The new ranking system significantly correlated with complexity of surgery (P < 0.0001) as well as with the length of the hospital stay (P < 0.0001). A total of 144 surgeons from 10 different centers around the world and at different levels of training returned the survey. Ninety percent of the case presentations were correctly graded. The classification was considered to be simple (92% of the respondents), reproducible (91%), logical (92%), useful (90%), and comprehensive (89%). The answers of both questionnaires were not dependent on the origin of the reply and the level of training of the surgeons. Conclusions: The new complication classification appears reliable and may represent a compelling tool for quality assessment in surgery in all parts of the world. The lack of a uniform way of reporting complications hampers interpretation of surgical outcome data and quality assessment. The authors revisited a previously reported classification of complications and propose a new grading system. The new classification was tested in a cohort of 6336 patients undergoing general surgery and through an international survey.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

Dindo, D, Demartines, N, & Clavien, P. A. (2004). Classification of Surgical Complications. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

MLA

Dindo, Daniel, et al. "Classification of Surgical Complications." 2004. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

Chicago

Dindo, Daniel, Nicolas Demartines, and Pierre-Alain Clavien. 2004. "Classification of Surgical Complications.". https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

Harvard

Dindo, D, Demartines, N. and Clavien, P. A. 2004, Classification of Surgical Complications, Annals of Surgery, available at: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae [Accessed 6 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Classification of Surgical Complications
Author / contributors
Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Publisher
Annals of Surgery
Publication year
2004
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied