Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Prediction of infection in the emergency department—a machine learning model

Sara N. Søgaard et al · Frontiers Media S.A · 2026

Open access available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Open access available

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Open resource

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

BackgroundThe integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into emergency medicine holds promise for enhancing early diagnosis and clinical decision-making. Traditional diagnostic approaches often rely on physician judgment or early warning scores that may delay identification of infections, especially when these tools prioritize outcomes such as mortality or ICU admission over early infection detection.ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify the most informative predictors of infection at emergency department (ED) admission using machine learning (ML), and to develop a predictive model for infection among acutely admitted patients with suspected infection.MethodsFour ML algorithms were evaluated: Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), and Random Forest (RF). Sequential forward selection was applied to LR and KNN to optimize predictor input. DT and RF incorporated intrinsic feature selection. Model performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value (PPV/NPV), accuracy, area under the ROC curve (AUC), average precision score (AP) with five-fold cross-validation.ResultsRF model outperformed the other ML models, achieving a specificity of 75%, a PPV of 94%, and an accuracy of 80% while DT showed marginally higher sensitivity but poorer specificity. LR and KNN demonstrated intermediate performance. The RF model had the highest mean AUC of 84% and AP of 96%.ConclusionRF model using readily available clinical variables—including C-reactive protein, leucocyte count, temperature, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate—can effectively predict infection at ED admission. This supports the potential of ML to enhance early infection detection and guide timely treatment in emergency settings.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, S. N. S. E. (2026). Prediction of infection in the emergency department—a machine learning model. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.1812692

MLA

al, Sara N. Søgaard et. "Prediction of infection in the emergency department—a machine learning model." 2026. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.1812692.

Chicago

al, Sara N. Søgaard et. 2026. "Prediction of infection in the emergency department—a machine learning model.". https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.1812692.

Harvard

al, S. N. S. E. 2026, Prediction of infection in the emergency department—a machine learning model, Frontiers Media S.A, available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.1812692 [Accessed 7 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Prediction of infection in the emergency department—a machine learning model
Author / contributors
Sara N. Søgaard et al
Publisher
Frontiers Media S.A
Publication year
2026
ISSN
2624-8212
ISSN
2624-8212
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied