Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Assessment of newly designed fonts for visual accessibility.

Gordon E Legge et al · Public Library of Science (PLoS) · 2026

Open access available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Open access available

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Open resource

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

<h4>Purpose</h4>The visual accessibility of fonts refers to the range of print sizes and efficiency with which readers can access text. One goal of font design may be to maximize accessibility for a wide range of users including those with low vision. Here, we compare behavioral and automated methods for evaluating the accessibility of a font for both normal and simulated low vision.<h4>Method</h4>We evaluated the accessibility of a newly designed font, ACT Easy. In Experiment 1, we used a behavioral (psychophysical) approach to compare regular and bold versions of ACT Easy to Courier, Frutiger, and Gotham. 22 normally sighted young adults were tested with a computerized version of MNREAD in two conditions: normal viewing, and text digitally filtered to simulate moderate low vision (20/90 acuity). The outcome measures were reading acuity, critical print size, maximum reading speed, and participants' preference rankings. In Experiment 2, we used an automated method to estimate the equivalent of reading acuity for eleven state-of-the-art Optical Character Recognition models. The models read MNREAD sentences in ACT Easy and five mainstream fonts. We explored how accurately the models mimicked human performance.<h4>Results</h4>In Experiment 1, ACT Easy Regular compared well in reading acuity and critical print size with Courier, the best of the other fonts for both normal and simulated low-vision conditions. ACT Easy Regular and Gotham were favored in the preference rankings. In Experiment 2, nine of the eleven OCR models showed changes in reading acuity similar to humans in the normal and simulated low-vision conditions. Two of the models also exhibited human-like variations across fonts.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Behavioral and automated methods are both capable of revealing subtle differences in the visual accessibility of fonts. The behavioral method requires labor-intensive human testing. The automated method does not require human testing, and may sometimes provide a practical alternative.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, G. E. L. E. (2026). Assessment of newly designed fonts for visual accessibility. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345068

MLA

al, Gordon E Legge et. "Assessment of newly designed fonts for visual accessibility." 2026. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345068.

Chicago

al, Gordon E Legge et. 2026. "Assessment of newly designed fonts for visual accessibility.". https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345068.

Harvard

al, G. E. L. E. 2026, Assessment of newly designed fonts for visual accessibility, Public Library of Science (PLoS), available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345068 [Accessed 8 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Assessment of newly designed fonts for visual accessibility.
Author / contributors
Gordon E Legge et al
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication year
2026
ISSN
1932-6203
ISSN
1932-6203
Language
English
Copied