Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Pelaporan Keberlanjutan : Standar dan Pengungkapan (Systematice Literature Review)

Rizki Agung Santoso et al · Universitas Trunojoyo Madura · 2025

Open-access full text
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Open-access full text

Texto completo identificado como acceso abierto.
Open text

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Sustainability reporting has garnered global attention in response to increasing demands for corporate accountability and transparency in environmental, social, and governance aspects. Although various reporting standards are available, their application and effectiveness in academic research still vary significantly. This study aims to examine the development of sustainability reporting literature, evaluate the dominant reporting standards used, and analyze the measurement methods employed in academic articles. A systematic literature review approach was applied to 30 selected articles published across five major databases: Emerald Insight, ScienceDirect, ResearchGate, SSRN, and DOAJ. The articles were thematically analyzed based on their objectives, the sustainability reporting standards adopted (e.g., GRI, SASB, IR, TCFD), analytical methods, and key findings. The results indicate that the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) is the most commonly used standard, followed by a blended reporting approach. Most of the articles emphasize the importance of reporting quality, stakeholder engagement, and the integration of multiple frameworks. Commonly used methods include content analysis, panel data regression, and bibliometric analysis. In conclusion, sustainability reporting remains a growing area of research characterized by multidisciplinary approaches. The findings highlight the need for greater harmonization of reporting standards and more consistent measurement methodologies

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, R. A. S. E. (2025). Pelaporan Keberlanjutan: Standar dan Pengungkapan (Systematice Literature Review). https://doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v18i2.30126

MLA

al, Rizki Agung Santoso et. "Pelaporan Keberlanjutan: Standar dan Pengungkapan (Systematice Literature Review)." 2025. https://doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v18i2.30126.

Chicago

al, Rizki Agung Santoso et. 2025. "Pelaporan Keberlanjutan: Standar dan Pengungkapan (Systematice Literature Review).". https://doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v18i2.30126.

Harvard

al, R. A. S. E. 2025, Pelaporan Keberlanjutan: Standar dan Pengungkapan (Systematice Literature Review), Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, available at: https://doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v18i2.30126 [Accessed 8 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Pelaporan Keberlanjutan : Standar dan Pengungkapan (Systematice Literature Review)
Author / contributors
Rizki Agung Santoso et al
Publisher
Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
Publication year
2025
ISSN
1829-7935
ISSN
1829-7935
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied