Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Randomised controlled trial comparing antibiotic cement bead pouch versus negative pressure wound therapy for the management of severe open tibia fracture wounds: Beads versus VAC (BvV) protocol

David Sanders et al · BMJ Publishing Group · 2026

Institutional access available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Institutional access available

El acceso puede requerir institución, suscripción, proxy, VPN o autenticación.
Open access

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Introduction Early open fracture management aims to minimise the risk of complications. For the most severe open fracture wounds, multiple irrigation and debridement surgeries are required to overcome severe wound contamination, to reassess the evolving tissue injury or to temporise and plan further surgery. When multiple irrigation and debridement surgeries are needed, uncertainty remains about how the open fracture wound should be managed to best minimise complications. The primary aim of this trial is to compare the antibiotic cement bead pouch vs negative pressure wound therapy in the management of patients with severe open tibia fracture wounds.Methods and analysis BvV is a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel arm randomised controlled trial that aims to enrol 312 adult patients admitted to a participating centre with a severe open tibia fracture requiring multiple irrigation and debridement surgeries. Participants will be randomly allocated on a 1:1 basis to either antibiotic cement bead pouch or negative pressure wound therapy. The primary outcome will be a composite outcome to evaluate clinical status 6 months after randomisation. Using the win ratio approach, we will hierarchically assess the composite outcome in the following order: (i) all-cause mortality, (ii) injury-related amputation of the lower extremity, (iii) unplanned reoperation to manage wound complications, an infection or promote fracture healing and (iv) clinical fracture healing assessed using the Functional IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT) instrument.Ethics and dissemination The BvV trial has been approved by a central institutional review board (IRB) (Advarra) for clinical sites in the USA, the ethics board at the coordinating centre at McMaster University (Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board), and participating sites not using the central institutional IRB (Fraser Health Research Ethics Board, The University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board, Newfoundland and Labrador Health Research Ethics Board, University of Manitoba Biomedical Research Ethics Board). Additional clinical sites who are in the start-up phase, as well as any new selected clinical sites, will obtain local approvals prior to initiating trial activities. This will include a clinical site in the UK who is in the process of obtaining the necessary approvals. Recruitment began in November 2023. Both interventions are frequently used to manage severe open fracture wounds, ensuring that the trial results can be easily transitioned into clinical practice. The results of this trial will be disseminated to national and international partners through peer-reviewed publications, academic conferences and stakeholder engagement activities.Trial registration number NCT05615844.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, D. S. E. (2026). Randomised controlled trial comparing antibiotic cement bead pouch versus negative pressure wound therapy for the management of severe open tibia fracture wounds: Beads versus VAC (BvV) protocol. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088521

MLA

al, David Sanders et. "Randomised controlled trial comparing antibiotic cement bead pouch versus negative pressure wound therapy for the management of severe open tibia fracture wounds: Beads versus VAC (BvV) protocol." 2026. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088521.

Chicago

al, David Sanders et. 2026. "Randomised controlled trial comparing antibiotic cement bead pouch versus negative pressure wound therapy for the management of severe open tibia fracture wounds: Beads versus VAC (BvV) protocol.". https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088521.

Harvard

al, D. S. E. 2026, Randomised controlled trial comparing antibiotic cement bead pouch versus negative pressure wound therapy for the management of severe open tibia fracture wounds: Beads versus VAC (BvV) protocol, BMJ Publishing Group, available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088521 [Accessed 7 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Randomised controlled trial comparing antibiotic cement bead pouch versus negative pressure wound therapy for the management of severe open tibia fracture wounds: Beads versus VAC (BvV) protocol
Author / contributors
David Sanders et al
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
Publication year
2026
ISSN
2044-6055
ISSN
2044-6055
Language
English
Copied