Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo de revista

Treacherous Evidence: Archival Documents and the Search for Peking Man

Michael F. Roberts et al · Paleoanthropology Society · 2021

Supplementary material available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.
Serial publication

11th Annual Meeting of the European Society for the Study of Human Evolution Abstracts Online, 22-24 September 2021

This serial publication contains 440 related contents.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Supplementary material available

El enlace apunta a material asociado, anexos, tablas, datos o página complementaria. No se marca como libro/texto completo.
Open material

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

The Peking Man skeletal materials, excavated in China in the 1920s and 1930s, disappeared in December 1941. The assumption that the fossils were acquired by the U.S. military has emerged as the core idea of what we call the “Standard Scenario.” We challenge this scenario by 1) highlighting the factual and chronological inconsistencies in the accounts of the loss of the fossils; 2) critiquing the casual and uncritical acceptance of personal reports lacking independent verification; 3) emphasizing the absence in official archives of supposed documents used to support the Standard Scenario; and, 4) reanalyzing a 1972 photograph used by some investigators to associate the fossils with the U.S. Marines. Our detailed forensic analysis strongly suggests the 1972 photograph is a deception. In addition, we present 5) a previously unknown document from U.S. State Department archives that indicates it is very unlikely that the fossils were delivered to American hands. We propose that there is no evidence the U.S. ever obtained the fossils and that any future investigations must be based on research into actual documents relevant to their loss. Our approach should invite mindful consideration of alternatives to the Standard Scenario that have been thus far ignored.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, M. F. R. E. (2021). Treacherous Evidence: Archival Documents and the Search for Peking Man. https://doi.org/10.48738/2021.iss1.72

MLA

al, Michael F. Roberts et. "Treacherous Evidence: Archival Documents and the Search for Peking Man." 2021. https://doi.org/10.48738/2021.iss1.72.

Chicago

al, Michael F. Roberts et. 2021. "Treacherous Evidence: Archival Documents and the Search for Peking Man.". https://doi.org/10.48738/2021.iss1.72.

Harvard

al, M. F. R. E. 2021, Treacherous Evidence: Archival Documents and the Search for Peking Man, Paleoanthropology Society, available at: https://doi.org/10.48738/2021.iss1.72 [Accessed 7 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Treacherous Evidence: Archival Documents and the Search for Peking Man
Author / contributors
Michael F. Roberts et al
Publisher
Paleoanthropology Society
Publication year
2021
ISSN
1545-0031
ISSN
1545-0031
Language
English
Copied