Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo de revista

A New Analysis of An Old Box of Bones: Debunking a Peking Man Deception

Elizabeth M. DeVisser et al · Paleoanthropology Society · 2021

Supplementary material available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.
Serial publication

11th Annual Meeting of the European Society for the Study of Human Evolution Abstracts Online, 22-24 September 2021

This serial publication contains 440 related contents.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Supplementary material available

El enlace apunta a material asociado, anexos, tablas, datos o página complementaria. No se marca como libro/texto completo.
Open material

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Anthropologists have searched fruitlessly for the Peking Man fossils for almost eighty years. Writers have made many unwarranted claims about the loss of the fossils, starting with the assumption that they were transferred from Chinese to American control just before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941 and then brought to the United States. This line of thinking is primarily supported by a highly suspect piece of evidence that came to public attention in 1972—a photograph of a Marine footlocker with many bones, one of which appeared to be a Peking Man skull. Although experts examined the photograph, no formal analysis was performed. Nonetheless, people who have written about this subject have assumed the box of bones contains at least one of the Peking Man fossils and thus that the collection reached the U.S. After conducting a detailed inventory and analysis of the contents of the footlocker as revealed in the photograph, we propose that the photograph is a deception; all bones except the skull are modern anatomical specimens while the skull is best interpreted as a teaching cast. Thus, the photograph cannot be used as evidence that the Peking Man fossils ever came to the U.S.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, E. M. D. E. (2021). A New Analysis of An Old Box of Bones: Debunking a Peking Man Deception. https://doi.org/10.48738/2021.iss1.71

MLA

al, Elizabeth M. DeVisser et. "A New Analysis of An Old Box of Bones: Debunking a Peking Man Deception." 2021. https://doi.org/10.48738/2021.iss1.71.

Chicago

al, Elizabeth M. DeVisser et. 2021. "A New Analysis of An Old Box of Bones: Debunking a Peking Man Deception.". https://doi.org/10.48738/2021.iss1.71.

Harvard

al, E. M. D. E. 2021, A New Analysis of An Old Box of Bones: Debunking a Peking Man Deception, Paleoanthropology Society, available at: https://doi.org/10.48738/2021.iss1.71 [Accessed 10 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
A New Analysis of An Old Box of Bones: Debunking a Peking Man Deception
Author / contributors
Elizabeth M. DeVisser et al
Publisher
Paleoanthropology Society
Publication year
2021
ISSN
1545-0031
ISSN
1545-0031
Language
English
Copied