Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo de revista

Comparative analysis of anthropogenic CO2 emissions in Thailand using the ODIAC and CAMS datasets

Sirapong Sooktawee et al · Elsevier · 2026

Open access available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.
Serial publication

A beyond GDP approach in times of economic recession. The case of Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) for Greece during 1995 to 2022

This serial publication contains 148 related contents.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Open access available

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Open resource

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Monitoring and managing greenhouse gas emissions in each country is essential to achieving the targets of the UNFCCC framework. Thailand has reported GHG emissions but lacks high resolution spatial emission data, which is crucial for identifying high concentration areas for management. The Open-Data Inventory for Anthropogenic Carbon dioxide (ODIAC) and the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) were compared with the national inventory provided by the Department of Climate Change and Environment (DCCE). Piecewise regression, spatial emission trend differences, ratios, and trend change indices were applied to investigate changes in emission time series, high emission areas, and emission trends. The results showed that emissions are approximately 2–3 times higher in ODIAC and less than 2 times higher in CAMS compared with the DCCE inventory. Emission trends were 19.68 MtCO2-eq/year, 15.55 MtCO2-eq/year, and 5.84 MtCO2-eq/year for ODIAC, CAMS, and DCCE, respectively. Both ODIAC and CAMS captured high emission areas, such as the Bangkok Metropolitan Region, but their emission trends during the latter sub-period differed in direction. Although differences exist in the characteristics of the datasets, they provide valuable information for GHG management. Harmonizing various datasets is required to improve comparability and ensure consistent interpretation.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, S. S. E. (2026). Comparative analysis of anthropogenic CO2 emissions in Thailand using the ODIAC and CAMS datasets. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2026.101258

MLA

al, Sirapong Sooktawee et. "Comparative analysis of anthropogenic CO2 emissions in Thailand using the ODIAC and CAMS datasets." 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2026.101258.

Chicago

al, Sirapong Sooktawee et. 2026. "Comparative analysis of anthropogenic CO2 emissions in Thailand using the ODIAC and CAMS datasets.". https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2026.101258.

Harvard

al, S. S. E. 2026, Comparative analysis of anthropogenic CO2 emissions in Thailand using the ODIAC and CAMS datasets, Elsevier, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2026.101258 [Accessed 9 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Comparative analysis of anthropogenic CO2 emissions in Thailand using the ODIAC and CAMS datasets
Author / contributors
Sirapong Sooktawee et al
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication year
2026
ISSN
2665-9727
ISSN
2665-9727
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied