Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Comparing YOLO and U-net deep learning algorithms in chronic wound image segmentation

Indrani Marchal et al · BMC · 2026

Supplementary material available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Supplementary material available

El enlace apunta a material asociado, anexos, tablas, datos o página complementaria. No se marca como libro/texto completo.
Open material

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Abstract Chronic wound analysis is crucial for effective wound care, necessitating precise and efficient segmentation techniques. This study explores the use of YOLOv8 and YOLO11, renowned deep learning algorithms for object detection, in medical image segmentation. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted comparing different versions of YOLOv8 and YOLO11 with the benchmark U-Net model using the FUSeg and Wound Data databases. Both databases were used simultaneously for training and testing to achieve a cross-dataset validation, ensuring the robustness of our models, and highlighting the importance of having data from different sources to represent the problem in various clinical contexts, thereby allowing AI models to be more adaptable and generalizable. Results show that both YOLO models significantly outperform U-Net in terms of segmentation accuracy, generalization, and inference speed. YOLOv8n achieved the highest performance with an IoU of 71.7%, a precision of 83.8%, a recall of 77.9%, and a DSC of 79.3%, and, while YOLO11s, the best performing of the YOLO11 models (IoU of 70.1%, Precision of 81.9%, Recall of 79.9%, and DSC of 78.5%), distinguished itself for its stability between thresholds and robustness across datasets. This research confirms that modern YOLO architectures offer fast, accurate, and robust solutions for automated wound segmentation, laying the groundwork for further development in AI-driven wound analysis and diagnosis.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, I. M. E. (2026). Comparing YOLO and U-net deep learning algorithms in chronic wound image segmentation. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02266-7

MLA

al, Indrani Marchal et. "Comparing YOLO and U-net deep learning algorithms in chronic wound image segmentation." 2026. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02266-7.

Chicago

al, Indrani Marchal et. 2026. "Comparing YOLO and U-net deep learning algorithms in chronic wound image segmentation.". https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02266-7.

Harvard

al, I. M. E. 2026, Comparing YOLO and U-net deep learning algorithms in chronic wound image segmentation, BMC, available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02266-7 [Accessed 7 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Comparing YOLO and U-net deep learning algorithms in chronic wound image segmentation
Author / contributors
Indrani Marchal et al
Publisher
BMC
Publication year
2026
ISSN
1471-2342
ISSN
1471-2342
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied