Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Prospective primary teachers’ views on the nature of science

Amador Rodriguez, Rafael Yecid et al · OmniaScience · 2021

Open-access full text
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

CONICET Digital CONICET Digital OAI-PMH
Entrar por CONICET Digital
Main access

Open-access full text

Texto completo identificado como acceso abierto.
Open text

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

This article presents the results of a piece of research that analyzed the views on the nature of science (NOS) among student teachers enrolled in programs of Primary Education at two public universities in Spain. Previous studies have reported that science teachers maintain ‘eclectic’ epistemological perspectives on science; in this article, we test if such a hypothesis holds when teachers’ NOS ideas are ‘anchored’ in specific periods and topics of the philosophy of science. We studied 114 prospective teachers attending an undergraduate teaching course with emphasis on the natural sciences at the Universities of Burgos and Valladolid in the period of 2017-18. A Likert-scale questionnaire with 37 items was applied to determine trends in those teachers’ epistemological views on science. The results showed that teachers’ views are mostly correlated with the philosophical period of Logical Positivism/Received View, and to some extent to the period of Recent and Contemporary Accounts. Regarding the classical epistemological topics of correspondence, methodologies, intervention, evolution and representation, teachers’ views could be related to the period of Logical Positivism/Received View and Critical Rationalism, but also to the New Philosophy of Science. The main conclusion of this study is that teachers’ expressed views on NOS are epistemologically eclectic to a much smaller degree when examined with more details concerning specific periods and topics of the philosophy of science. Fil: Amador Rodriguez, Rafael Yecid. Universidad del Norte; Colombia Fil: Aduriz Bravo, Agustin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Centro de Formación e Investigación en Enseñanza de las Ciencias; Argentina

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

Amador Rodriguez, R. Y. E. A. (2021). Prospective primary teachers’ views on the nature of science. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/162623

MLA

Amador Rodriguez, Rafael Yecid et al. "Prospective primary teachers’ views on the nature of science." 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/162623.

Chicago

Amador Rodriguez, Rafael Yecid et al. 2021. "Prospective primary teachers’ views on the nature of science.". http://hdl.handle.net/11336/162623.

Harvard

Amador Rodriguez, R. Y. E. A. 2021, Prospective primary teachers’ views on the nature of science, OmniaScience, available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/162623 [Accessed 8 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Prospective primary teachers’ views on the nature of science
Author / contributors
Amador Rodriguez, Rafael Yecid et al
Publisher
OmniaScience
Publication year
2021
ISSN
2014-5349
ISSN
2014-5349
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied