Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

The accuracy of robotic-assisted zygomatic implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Shengchi Fan et al · BMC · 2026

Open access available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Open access available

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Open resource

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Abstract Background This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at assessing the current status of robotic-assisted implant surgery (r-CAIS) in zygomatic implant (ZI) placement, with a particular focus on deviations between planned and placed implant positions. Materials and methods The review protocol was specified and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024616949). All primary studies were considered eligible, including in vitro studies, clinical studies, and hybrid experimental–clinical studies. Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted through April 2025 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The primary outcome was planned/placed deviation with or without other implant placement techniques. Results Ten studies (seven in vitro, two clinical, and one hybrid experimental–clinical) involving 185 ZIs in 83 models /patients were included. Of these, nine studies were eligible for quantitative synthesis, contributing 161 ZIs placed using r-CAIS and 97 using dynamic CAIS (d-CAIS) to the pooled mean meta-analysis. The pooled mean ZI deviations from the r-CAIS group were 1.04 mm (95% CI: 0.74–1.35 mm) at the entry point and 1.47 mm (95% CI: 1.07–1.87 mm) at the exit point, and angular deviations were 1.22° (95% CI: 0.82–1.62°). The pooled mean ZI deviations from the d-CAIS group were 1.30 mm (95% CI: 1.00–1.60 mm) at the entry point and 2.02 mm (95% CI: 1.81–2.23 mm) at the exit point, and angular deviations were 2.00° (95% CI: 1.33–2.67°). Significant differences in deviation were observed at the exit and angular levels in favor of r-CAIS. Conclusions r-CAIS demonstrates significantly superior accuracy compared with d-CAIS in ZIs placement. However, as r-CAIS remains at an early stage of clinical integration and only limited clinical studies have been reported, its long-term applicability requires further validation through cadaveric and well-designed prospective clinical investigations.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, S. F. E. (2026). The accuracy of robotic-assisted zygomatic implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-07816-7

MLA

al, Shengchi Fan et. "The accuracy of robotic-assisted zygomatic implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis." 2026. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-07816-7.

Chicago

al, Shengchi Fan et. 2026. "The accuracy of robotic-assisted zygomatic implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.". https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-07816-7.

Harvard

al, S. F. E. 2026, The accuracy of robotic-assisted zygomatic implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMC, available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-07816-7 [Accessed 7 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
The accuracy of robotic-assisted zygomatic implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Author / contributors
Shengchi Fan et al
Publisher
BMC
Publication year
2026
ISSN
1472-6831
ISSN
1472-6831
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied