← Volver a resultados
Ficha bibliográfica · Consulta y acceso
Artículo de revista

Comparative Efficacy of Synthetic and Natural Tenderizers on Quality Characteristics of Restructured Spent Hen Meat Slices (RSHS)

Rushikesh Ambadasrao Kantale et al · Springer Nature · 2019

Acceso abierto disponible
Lectura rápida. Revisá los datos básicos del recurso y luego accedé al contenido desde el botón principal. En esta ficha solo se muestra la información necesaria para identificar la obra, citarla y abrirla.
Publicación seriada

3D Printing of Materials and Printing Parameters with Animal Resources: A Review

Esta publicación seriada contiene 538 contenidos relacionados.

Acceso al recurso

Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.

Acceso principal

Acceso abierto disponible

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Abrir recurso

Resumen

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Abstract In the present study, comparative efficacy of natural as well as synthetic tenderizers on the quality characteristics of restructured spent hen meat slices (RSHS) was studied. Four different batches of RSHS viz. Control (without any tenderizer), T1 (1.25% calcium chloride replacing salt in formulation), T2 and T3 (1.5% each of pineapple rind and fig powder, replacing binder in the formulation) were developed in pre-standardized formulation. Vacuum tumbling was performed for 2.5 h and cooked product (RSHS) was assayed for quality attributes. Samples were packaged in aerobic conditions, stored for 21 days under refrigeration (4±1°C) and were evaluated for pH, oxidative and microbial quality parameters at regular interval of 7 days. Water holding capacity of T2 was recorded the highest and significantly higher (p<0.05) than all other samples. The textural attributes of T2 were comparable to T1 but significantly higher (p<0.05) than C and T3. The colour attributes (L*, a*, and b* value) of T2 and T3 were improved due to use of natural tenderizers. During sensory evaluation, tenderness scores for T2 samples were recorded the highest. Throughout storage period, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), free fatty acids (FFA) and peroxide value (PV) followed an increasing trend for control as well as treated products; however, T2 showed a significantly (p<0.05) lower value than control and other treated samples. It can be concluded that good quality RSHS with better storage stability could be prepared by utilizing 1.5% pineapple rind powder as natural tenderizer.

Cómo citar

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, R. A. K. E. (2019). Comparative Efficacy of Synthetic and Natural Tenderizers on Quality Characteristics of Restructured Spent Hen Meat Slices (RSHS). https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e10

MLA

al, Rushikesh Ambadasrao Kantale et. "Comparative Efficacy of Synthetic and Natural Tenderizers on Quality Characteristics of Restructured Spent Hen Meat Slices (RSHS)." 2019. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e10.

Chicago

al, Rushikesh Ambadasrao Kantale et. 2019. "Comparative Efficacy of Synthetic and Natural Tenderizers on Quality Characteristics of Restructured Spent Hen Meat Slices (RSHS).". https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e10.

Harvard

al, R. A. K. E. 2019, Comparative Efficacy of Synthetic and Natural Tenderizers on Quality Characteristics of Restructured Spent Hen Meat Slices (RSHS), Springer Nature, available at: https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e10 [Accessed 29 Jun. 2026].

Compartir e imprimir

Guardá la ficha, copiá su enlace permanente o imprimila como PDF.

Exportar referencia

Si usás un gestor bibliográfico, podés exportar el registro en los formatos más comunes.

Detalles del recurso

Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.

Título
Comparative Efficacy of Synthetic and Natural Tenderizers on Quality Characteristics of Restructured Spent Hen Meat Slices (RSHS)
Autor / colaboradores
Rushikesh Ambadasrao Kantale et al
Editorial
Springer Nature
Año de publicación
2019
ISSN
2636-0772
ISSN
2636-0772
Idioma
eng

Materias

Explorá otros recursos relacionados a partir de estas materias.

Copiado