← Volver a resultados
Ficha bibliográfica · Consulta y acceso
Artículo de revista

Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat

Ermie Jr. Mariano et al · Springer Nature · 2023

Acceso abierto disponible
Lectura rápida. Revisá los datos básicos del recurso y luego accedé al contenido desde el botón principal. En esta ficha solo se muestra la información necesaria para identificar la obra, citarla y abrirla.
Publicación seriada

3D Printing of Materials and Printing Parameters with Animal Resources: A Review

Esta publicación seriada contiene 538 contenidos relacionados.

Acceso al recurso

Entrá al contenido desde la opción principal o elegí otra fuente disponible.

Acceso principal

Acceso abierto disponible

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Abrir recurso

Resumen

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Abstract The cultured meat industry is continuously evolving due to the collective efforts of cultured meat companies and academics worldwide. Though still technologically limited, recent reports of regulatory approvals for cultured meat companies have initiated the standards-based approach towards cultured meat production. Incidents of deception in the meat industry call for fool-proof authentication methods to ensure consumer safety, product quality, and traceability. The cultured meat industry is not exempt from the threats of food fraud. Meat authentication techniques based on DNA, protein, and metabolite fingerprints of animal meat species needs to be evaluated for their applicability to cultured meat. Technique-based categorization of cultured meat products could ease the identification of appropriate authentication methods. The combination of methods with high sensitivity and specificity is key to increasing the accuracy and precision of meat authentication. The identification of markers (both physical and biochemical) to differentiate conventional meat from cultured meat needs to be established to ensure overall product traceability. The current review briefly discusses some areas in the cultured meat industry that are vulnerable to food fraud. Specifically, it targets the current meat and meat product authentication tests to emphasize the need for ensuring the traceability of cultured meat.

Cómo citar

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, E. J. M. E. (2023). Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2023.e48

MLA

al, Ermie Jr. Mariano et. "Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat." 2023. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2023.e48.

Chicago

al, Ermie Jr. Mariano et. 2023. "Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat.". https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2023.e48.

Harvard

al, E. J. M. E. 2023, Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat, Springer Nature, available at: https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2023.e48 [Accessed 30 Jun. 2026].

Compartir e imprimir

Guardá la ficha, copiá su enlace permanente o imprimila como PDF.

Exportar referencia

Si usás un gestor bibliográfico, podés exportar el registro en los formatos más comunes.

Detalles del recurso

Información bibliográfica útil para confirmar que se trata del material correcto.

Título
Checkmeat: A Review on the Applicability of Conventional Meat Authentication Techniques to Cultured Meat
Autor / colaboradores
Ermie Jr. Mariano et al
Editorial
Springer Nature
Año de publicación
2023
ISSN
2636-0772
ISSN
2636-0772
Idioma
eng

Materias

Explorá otros recursos relacionados a partir de estas materias.

Copiado