Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo de revista

Triplet versus doublet therapy in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

Keita Hayakawa et al · Nature Portfolio · 2026

Open access available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.
Serial publication

3D scan-based classification of Chinese young female hand morphology

This serial publication contains 688 related contents.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Open access available

Recurso identificado como acceso abierto, sin confirmar automáticamente si es texto completo directo.
Open resource

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Abstract First-line treatment options for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) are divided into two groups: androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI)-based doublet therapy and triplet therapy (which includes chemotherapy in addition to doublet therapy). However, differences in therapeutic efficacy between the two groups remain unclear. The aim of the study was to perform a comparative analysis between the two groups and to identify predictors of treatment response. We retrospectively recruited 500 patients with mHSPC treated with doublet or triplet therapy from our hospital and affiliated hospitals between 2013 and 2025. The cohort of patients with mHSPC treated with doublet therapy received ABI, ENZ, or APA in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog, such as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The cohort of those treated with triplet therapy received darolutamide plus ADT and docetaxel. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors of overall survival in patients with mHSPC. Propensity score matching was used to adjust the clinical background of patients. The outcome (prostate-specific antigen-progression-free survival, second progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS)) of triplet therapy was significantly better than that of doublet therapy in matched high-risk patients with mHSPC. Univariate and multivariate analyses of OS in matched patients with high-risk mHSPC treated with triplet or doublet therapy suggested that treatment choice (triplet or doublet), pretreatment LDH levels, and presence of Gleason pattern 5 influenced OS in patients with high-risk mHSPC. Subgroup analysis suggested that LDH levels and the presence of Gleason pattern 5 may be predictive factors of the treatment of patients with mHSPC. Our results showed that triplet therapy achieved a better outcome than doublet therapy in patients with mHSPC.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, K. H. E. (2026). Triplet versus doublet therapy in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44627-w

MLA

al, Keita Hayakawa et. "Triplet versus doublet therapy in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer." 2026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44627-w.

Chicago

al, Keita Hayakawa et. 2026. "Triplet versus doublet therapy in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.". https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44627-w.

Harvard

al, K. H. E. 2026, Triplet versus doublet therapy in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, Nature Portfolio, available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44627-w [Accessed 7 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Triplet versus doublet therapy in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Author / contributors
Keita Hayakawa et al
Publisher
Nature Portfolio
Publication year
2026
ISSN
2045-2322
ISSN
2045-2322
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied