Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of ketoprofen 50 mg capsules (Flogofin® & Profenid®) in healthy latin american volunteers

Baldo, M. N. et al · OMICS · 2015

Supplementary material available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

CONICET Digital CONICET Digital OAI-PMH
Entrar por CONICET Digital
Main access

Supplementary material available

El enlace apunta a material asociado, anexos, tablas, datos o página complementaria. No se marca como libro/texto completo.
Open material

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

The study was performed to compare the bioavailability of two ketoprofen capsule (50 mg) formulations: Flogofin®, as test formulation, and Profenid®, as reference formulation. The study was conducted open with randomized two period crossover design and 1 week washout period in 24 fasting, healthy latino-american male volunteers and performed at the Biopharmaceutical Research Center Dominguez Lab. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 24 h and plasma was separated and analyzed for ketoprofen, using a sensitive, reproducible, and accurate method by liquid chromatography ? tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Pharmacokinetic parameters: AUC0-24, AUC0-∞, Cmax, Tmax, T1/2 and Ke, were analyzed from plasma concentrations of both formulations. The means AUC0-24 for test and reference formulation were 50.21 ([μg h]/mL) - 50.28 ([μgh]/mL), 52.38 ([μg h]/mL) - 50.84 ([μg h]/mL) for AUC0-∞, and 21.58 μg/mL - 21.65 μg/mL for Cmax, respectively. Statistical modules (ANOVA and 90% confidence intervals) were applied to AUC0?24, AUC0-∞, and Cmax to assess the bioequivalence of the two brands which revealed no significant difference between them, and 90% CI fell within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80%-125%. Based on these statistical inferences, both formulations were found to be bioequivalent. Fil: Baldo, M. N.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Santa Fe. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral; Argentina. Dominguez Lab; Argentina Fil: Hunzicker, Gabriel Alejandro. Dominguez Lab; Argentina

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

Baldo, M. N. E. A. (2015). Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of ketoprofen 50 mg capsules (Flogofin® & Profenid®) in healthy latin american volunteers. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/9909

MLA

Baldo, M. N. et al. "Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of ketoprofen 50 mg capsules (Flogofin® & Profenid®) in healthy latin american volunteers." 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/9909.

Chicago

Baldo, M. N. et al. 2015. "Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of ketoprofen 50 mg capsules (Flogofin® & Profenid®) in healthy latin american volunteers.". http://hdl.handle.net/11336/9909.

Harvard

Baldo, M. N. E. A. 2015, Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of ketoprofen 50 mg capsules (Flogofin® & Profenid®) in healthy latin american volunteers, OMICS, available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/9909 [Accessed 8 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of ketoprofen 50 mg capsules (Flogofin® & Profenid®) in healthy latin american volunteers
Author / contributors
Baldo, M. N. et al
Publisher
OMICS
Publication year
2015
ISSN
0975-0851
ISSN
0975-0851
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied