Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Comparative analysis of the ability of a set of CMIP3 and CMIP5 global climate models to represent precipitation in South America

Gulizia, Carla et al · John Wiley & Sons Ltd · 2015

Open-access full text
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

CONICET Digital CONICET Digital OAI-PMH
Entrar por CONICET Digital
Main access

Open-access full text

Texto completo identificado como acceso abierto.
Open text
Otras opciones de acceso Elegí el proveedor disponible para esta ficha.
CONICET Digital OAI-PMH
Acceder por CONICET Digital OAI-PMH

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the ability of two sets of global climate models derived from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Projects Phase 3 (CMIP3) and Phase 5 (CMIP5) to represent the summer, winter, and annual precipitation mean patterns in South America south of the equator and in three particular sub-regions, between years 1960 and 1999. Different metrics (relative bias, spatial correlation, RMSE, and relative errors) were calculated and compared between both projects in order to determine if there has been improvement from CMIP3 to CMIP5 models in the representation of regional rainfall. Results from this analysis indicate that for the analyzed seasons, precipitation simulated by both CMIP3 and CMIP5 models' ensembles exhibited some differences. In DJF the relative bias over Amazonia, central South America, eastern Argentina and Uruguay is reduced in CMIP5 compared to CMIP3. In JJA, the same occurs in some areas of Amazonia. Annual precipitation is also better represented by the CMIP5 than CMIP3 GCMs as they underestimate precipitation to a lesser extent, although in NE Brazil the overestimation values are much larger in CMIP5 than in CMIP3 analysis. In line with previous studies, the multi-model ensembles show the best representation of the observed patterns in most seasons and regions. Only in some cases, single GCMs (MIROC3.2(hires) -CMIP3- and MIROC4h -CMIP5-) presented better results than the ensemble. The high horizontal resolution of these models suggests that this could be a relevant issue for a more adequate estimation of rainfall at least in the analyzed regions. Fil: Gulizia, Carla. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Centro de Investigaciones del Mar y la Atmósfera. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Centro de Investigaciones del Mar y la Atmósfera; Argentina. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Francia Fil: Camilloni, Ines Angela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Centro de Investigaciones del Mar y la Atmósfera. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Centro de Investigaciones del Mar y la Atmósfera; Argentina. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Francia

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

Gulizia, C. E. A. (2015). Comparative analysis of the ability of a set of CMIP3 and CMIP5 global climate models to represent precipitation in South America. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/42037

MLA

Gulizia, Carla et al. "Comparative analysis of the ability of a set of CMIP3 and CMIP5 global climate models to represent precipitation in South America." 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/42037.

Chicago

Gulizia, Carla et al. 2015. "Comparative analysis of the ability of a set of CMIP3 and CMIP5 global climate models to represent precipitation in South America.". http://hdl.handle.net/11336/42037.

Harvard

Gulizia, C. E. A. 2015, Comparative analysis of the ability of a set of CMIP3 and CMIP5 global climate models to represent precipitation in South America, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/42037 [Accessed 7 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Comparative analysis of the ability of a set of CMIP3 and CMIP5 global climate models to represent precipitation in South America
Author / contributors
Gulizia, Carla et al
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Publication year
2015
ISSN
0899-8418
ISSN
0899-8418
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied