Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Differential responses of three grasses to defoliation, water and light availability

Altesor, Alice et al · Springer · 2017

Open-access full text
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

CONICET Digital CONICET Digital OAI-PMH
Entrar por CONICET Digital
Main access

Open-access full text

Texto completo identificado como acceso abierto.
Open text
Otras opciones de acceso Elegí el proveedor disponible para esta ficha.
CONICET Digital OAI-PMH
Acceder por CONICET Digital OAI-PMH

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

Grazing not only modifies the structure and functioning of grasslands, it also changes micro-environmental conditions that alter the availability of resources. The aim of this study was to analyze the response of grasses with different photosynthetic pathways (C3/C4), growth forms (prostrate/erect), and grazing responses (increaser/decreaser) to defoliation and resource availability. In a greenhouse, we performed a factorial experiment with three factors: defoliation, light, and water and three species: Axonopus affinis (C4 prostrate, increaser), Coelorachis selloana (C4 erect, decreaser), and Bromus auleticus (C3 erect, decreaser). We measured the relative growth rate (RGR), biomass assignment, and specific leaf area. The RGR of both C4 species was affected by light availability, while the decreaser C3 did not respond to any factor. Biomass allocation to leaves and stolons changed with the interaction between light and water in the C4 prostrate species (increaser). In the C4 erect grass (decreaser), biomass allocation was more affected by defoliation under low levels of light and water. Low light availability and defoliation reduced the assignment to leaves, while the allocation to rhizomes increased. Species-specific responses to resources availability that are modified by grazing were related to photosynthetic pathway, growth form, and grazing responses. Biomass allocation was related to strategies to avoid and/or tolerate grazing. The investment to leaves was limited by light and water availability in prostrate species, while in erect grasses it was controlled by defoliation and water availability. Our results highlight the importance of species responses to changes in resource availability associated to grazing regimes. Fil: Altesor, Alice. Universidad de la República; Uruguay Fil: Leoni, Elsa. Universidad de la República; Uruguay

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

Altesor, A. E. A. (2017). Differential responses of three grasses to defoliation, water and light availability. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/66101

MLA

Altesor, Alice et al. "Differential responses of three grasses to defoliation, water and light availability." 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/66101.

Chicago

Altesor, Alice et al. 2017. "Differential responses of three grasses to defoliation, water and light availability.". http://hdl.handle.net/11336/66101.

Harvard

Altesor, A. E. A. 2017, Differential responses of three grasses to defoliation, water and light availability, Springer, available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/66101 [Accessed 7 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Differential responses of three grasses to defoliation, water and light availability
Author / contributors
Altesor, Alice et al
Publisher
Springer
Publication year
2017
ISSN
1385-0237
ISSN
1385-0237
Language
English

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied