Back to results
Bibliographic record · Consultation and access
Artículo

Restorative Justice in Rantau Prapat District Court for Oil Palm Theft Cases

Dwi Prayetno et al · Yayasan Lembaga Studi Makwa · 2025

Institutional access available
Quick overview. Review the resource’s basic details, then access the content using the main button. This page shows only the information needed to identify, cite, and open the work.

Resource access

Open the content from the main option or choose another available source.

DOAJ DOAJ Articles
Entrar por DOAJ
Main access

Institutional access available

El acceso puede requerir institución, suscripción, proxy, VPN o autenticación.
Open access

Summary

Descripción general del contenido del recurso.

This study examines the implementation of restorative justice in resolving oil palm theft cases at the Rantau Prapat District Court, Indonesia. The research is grounded in the increasing application of restorative approaches within Indonesia’s criminal justice system, particularly following regulatory reforms encouraging diversion and mediation in minor property crimes. Employing a normative-empirical method, this study combines statutory analysis with field data derived from court decisions, interviews with legal practitioners, and relevant secondary literature. The objective is to evaluate how restorative justice principles—such as victim-offender dialogue, restitution, community involvement, and proportional accountability—are applied in practice and to assess their effectiveness in achieving substantive justice. The findings reveal that restorative justice mechanisms in oil palm theft cases prioritize compensation, reconciliation, and social harmony over punitive imprisonment. In several cases, settlement agreements facilitated by judges and prosecutors resulted in restitution payments and formal apologies, leading to case dismissal or reduced sentencing. This approach has contributed to reducing case backlogs and prison overcrowding while promoting community-based conflict resolution. However, challenges remain, including inconsistencies in procedural standards, limited institutional guidelines, and disparities in judicial discretion. Additionally, concerns arise regarding power imbalances between plantation companies and economically vulnerable defendants. The study concludes that restorative justice at the Rantau Prapat District Court reflects a progressive shift toward a more humanistic and efficient criminal justice model. Strengthening regulatory clarity, institutional capacity, and safeguards for vulnerable parties is essential to ensure fairness, transparency, and sustainability in the application of restorative justice for property-related offenses in Indonesia.

How to cite

Elegí el formato que necesitás y copiá la referencia al portapapeles.

APA 7

al, D. P. E. (2025). Restorative Justice in Rantau Prapat District Court for Oil Palm Theft Cases. https://doi.org/10.57255/hakamain.v4i2.1472

MLA

al, Dwi Prayetno et. "Restorative Justice in Rantau Prapat District Court for Oil Palm Theft Cases." 2025. https://doi.org/10.57255/hakamain.v4i2.1472.

Chicago

al, Dwi Prayetno et. 2025. "Restorative Justice in Rantau Prapat District Court for Oil Palm Theft Cases.". https://doi.org/10.57255/hakamain.v4i2.1472.

Harvard

al, D. P. E. 2025, Restorative Justice in Rantau Prapat District Court for Oil Palm Theft Cases, Yayasan Lembaga Studi Makwa, available at: https://doi.org/10.57255/hakamain.v4i2.1472 [Accessed 8 Aug. 2026].

Share and print

Save the record, copy its permanent link, or print it as a PDF.

Export reference

You can export the record in common formats for use in a reference manager.

Resource details

Bibliographic information to help confirm that this is the correct material.

Title
Restorative Justice in Rantau Prapat District Court for Oil Palm Theft Cases
Author / contributors
Dwi Prayetno et al
Publisher
Yayasan Lembaga Studi Makwa
Publication year
2025
ISSN
2962-9241
ISSN
2962-9241
Language
ind

Subjects

Explore related resources through these subjects.

Copied